$2M+ of lies to win power

I believe in truth in advertising. So does the commercial TV regulator that demands evidence for any claim you want to make before they give your ad clearance to air. Unfortunately for the voters of NSW, political parties are allowed to say what they want in an ad because they aren't answerable to any of the rules mere brands and businesses have to conform to.

If I made a fraudulent claim for a client in an ad, (for instance the kind of price saving offer mobile phone plans were notorious for before being fined into transparent pricing), the ACCC or ASIC would come after me. This election has seen Labor and unions spend twice the Liberals. Most of that $2,500,000 was on ads that say electricity prices will go up if Baird sells 49% of the poles and wires. It's a lie.

Their ads scream this lie despite ACCC chairman Rod Simms saying this isn't the case. Even the Australian Energy regulator is on record that whoever owns the poles and wires in NSW after the election he will insist they reduce their prices by 20-30% over the next five years. There is no evidence for the claim made in Labor's ads that I believe would have satisfied the broadcast standards that commercial advertisers have to comply with. In fact, there is much historic evidence from previous power privatisations showing prices are lower outside government ownership. This has been acknowledged by such Labor luminaries as Bob Carr, Morris Iemma, Michael Costa and Anna Bligh when they attempted to sell the poles and wires under their governments.

It frustrates me as a professional marketer that in the 21st century political parties of any persuasion can play 1984 mind games with the truth and run them in prime time. The ABC Fact Check merely called Foley's ad pitch "spin". I prefer the robust language of former Labor Energy Minister and ACTU president Martin Ferguson. He says Foley's spin is "rank opportunism and scaremongering... sending a clear message he doesn't care about jobs and energy security."

Politicians' ad claims are officially accountable to... themselves

Here is the law (or lack of) that applies to political advertising as published by adstandards:

"Currently, there is no legal requirement for the content of political advertising to be factually correct. Complainants are advised to raise their concerns with the advertiser directly and/or with their local Member of Parliament."

Maybe we should just ban political advertising, we banned cigarette ads for telling us porkies.

The optimum lengths of social media

People now have short attention spans. So to connect you have to cut through. Keep it honest. Keep it simple. And keep it true to your brand. As for length, keep it short.

Twitter

71 - 100 characters

Posts with 40 characters get 86% more engagement

Google+

25 characters

Facebook

40 characters

Linked In

Posts 16 to 25 words long

Videos

Average length watched is 2.7 minutes

The average customer has an attention span of

How does a brand catch a customer's interest when their attention span is now less than that of a goldfish? I spent a few seconds Googling to discover the average person's attention span has shrunk since 1998, by 11 minutes.

The average attention span today is 8 seconds

The National Center for Biotechnology Information says our attention span is now 1 second less than goldfish. What hope does a brand have to convince us to buy?

Consider a tube of toothpaste. The average main grocery buyer now spends less than 20 minutes in the supermarket for the big weekly shop. With over 10,000 items to choose from it's not surprising when faced with so many options brands are struggling to catch shoppers' interest. At the dental care section 27% of shoppers walk away without making a decision.

You may be aware Australians have never been better educated, the number of university graduates has almost quadrupled since 1986, from 6% to more than 21%. Are we any smarter or better prepared to make purchase decisions?

We are exposed to five times the quantity of information every day than we received 30 years ago, (you may be surprised just how many ads we are exposed to). Yet we have less free time to consider. The Economist explains that time poverty is a wealth syndrome, the more money we have the more we value our time and the more choices we are confronted with to spend that time. At the other extreme, cash strapped people have largely given up trying to decipher so much information, they are influenced by price like never before.

Price is increasingly winning over brand appeal. It's at the heart of the growing success of ALDI – less items to choose from, mostly unbranded, all at lower prices. This has seen their share of grocery sales reach 10%, a big slice of the market brands are mostly missing.

Even brands are struggling to be seen in Woolworths

According to Woolworths own research "more than a third of the items in Woolworths’ supermarket trolleys are purchased on promotion." That's an increase of 10% a year for the last two years.

"Australians hunting for bargains are the big winners, with one in four customers (25%) purchasing nearly half of the food and drinks in their trolley on special."

How do the retailers manipulate the time poor if not with price?

One journalist recently warned shoppers something brand marketers pay dearly for:

• The most expensive brands, or the ones being promoted heavily, will always be on the two shelves that sit between waist and shoulder height.
• Cheaper products are often stocked below knee height.
• Supermarkets know that you may only want milk so put it at the back of the store in the hope you’ll pick up items you don’t need.

Not only are the retailers asking brands for price rebates, Private Label substitutes are also catching once impregnable brands in a pincer movement. So if you believe in protecting the value of your brand you'll probably want to avoid discounting too often. Only the biggest and most desperate can afford to pay Coles and Woolies to be on promotion. In the past sales managers have encouraged the benefits of putting products on promotion to drive sales. Does it still work in the era of short attention spans?

My associates at consumer benchmarking specialists B4P spent a year researching the impact of sales promotions at Point of Purchase (POP). The clients were several of the largest global FMCG companies that are active promoters in Australia's supermarkets, every week of the year. They tested awareness before promotion, cut through in-store, trial, impact on sales and recall several weeks later.

Across all promotion types, (price promotion, competitions, bundled offers and bonuses), shoppers generally don't notice any of it. This is despite multi-million dollar spends on displays, cardboard, posters, banners, gondola ends and shelf strips. Most in-store promotions have become invisible.

Earned and shared media can still gain attention

As we learned over seven years growing Pacific West from a $6million pa frozen seafood minnow to a $38million challenger brand, you can drive shoppers to your product by creating original content to tell your story and social media to spread the word. Just remember your audience has a short attention span. Here is a charming infographic that shows the optimum number of times to post content on social media channels.

Think big, or detail will kill your business

"Look, I said I'd bring you the report on micromanagement,
just give me a minute!"

Stop sweating the small stuff, especially now there's so much of it. New technologies allow us to gather data on just about everything. So it's become accepted practice for marketers and sales to invest in new ways to gather stats and report to senior management. For those of you wondering what's the point, it has now been proven the more a business spends on technology, CRM systems and sales data, the less well it performs in profitable conversions.

The more technology marketers use, the worse the results

Sounds like a contradiction, but the research undertaken by Peter Strohkorb into sales and marketing collaboration in 2013/4, simply proves the more systems teams add the worse the sales results. It's symptomatic of what the authors of Blue Ocean Strategy postulated over a decade ago. A typical strategic plan is usually based on a plethora of research from silos across the business which forces management to dwell on detail. Management becomes paralyzed by information overload.

The businesses that thrive are the ones that step back and look at the big picture using a customer centric view of what could be possible. Here's how it works.

Focus on the big picture to create a Blue Ocean Strategy

With a Blue Ocean strategy, you can implement a clear brand building campaign

We've found time and again, once clients re-visit what they can be, the task of growing the business becomes clear. Our methods to help create clear differentiation set the business up for challenger brand growth. With a single minded compelling tag line that sets them apart, big picture thinking helps refresh the business. There is new enthusiasm we harness to recreate the brand and relaunch. The way is now clear to become a price setter, not taker and drive sales conversions.

See some of the ways a refreshed brand can improve profitability.

For a nation of gamblers we're marketing risk averse

The companies that rated best for effective marketing, according to a recent Gartner study, were the ones that spent the most time understanding their customers. Businesses that are introspective and fearful of action will lose sales to those actively talking to customers and prospects. 

How do you guarantee marketing success?

Jan-Patrick Schmitz, CEO of Montblanc North America, says "it obviously starts with the CEO. If he or she doesn’t understand that the business is about the customer and not operations, the CMO is going to have an uphill battle. Understanding your customer is about understanding what your business is and what your business will grow into.”

It's not a lottery, once you understand what customers want from your product or service, marketers that advocate for the customer in the boardroom will win.

Get the message right, then the risks are reduced irrespective of the mediums you then try. If you do understand your customers true needs and what they value most, and built your offer to satisfy those desires, it's time to check out the latest ways to advertise and connect.

Aussie business struggles, time for a creative way out

Will our kids ever be able to afford to buy a house? Can they even afford to rent? Here in Woolloomooloo 2 bed flats start at $1,000 a week, unfurnished! Unemployment is on the way up, mining investment on the way down. Coles and Woolies continue to squeeze farmers and FMCG brands while bricks and mortar retail is flat.

The big 4 banks are making record profits on higher margins than ever. If you are a small to medium business they probably won't give you a loan. 20 years ago 75% of bank lending was to business, now 75% goes to funding ballooning house prices.

This chart shows the decline in business investment post GFC

If businesses aren't investing in themselves, how can they grow let alone survive as the Internet destroys traditional business models?

Most managers have spent the last 6 years cutting and seeking efficiencies, hoping if they hang on long enough the market will recover. While local businesses seem to think it's conditions that are tough, World Bank figures show the world is booming – output was up $US75 trillion last year, which is about 20 per cent higher than the pre-GFC peak.

The world is moving on

Australians need to look outwards and recognise there isn't going to be a return to the way things were, the new reality is more rapid change and creative destruction. I use the word creative discerningly. It's the best way to describe the increasingly global competitive situation most businesses are struggling to get their heads around.

Historically change came slowly and could be managed by gradual adjustments of pricing, distribution or inputs. Not any more.

Enabled by the Internet, we now have Google replacing entire distribution channels with a search box. The Cloud has enabled brands such as Xero to offer with a lower cost and better service to leapfrog long established businesses like MYOB that relied on annual software upgrades. Social media has empowered determined consumers to "out" entrenched self-serving business practices, just look at CommBank's conflicted financial advice scandal that could cost it over $100million. (Or ANZ's Timbercorp scam and Macquarie's financial planners rort.)

These are all examples of a new business environment. New challenges require new thinking. A survey of over 300,0000 managers published by Harvard Business Review shows both CEOs and the next 3 levels of management aren't equipped to think outside the square.

The most important skills as rated by managers

Perhaps the skills that are most needed today to deal with the rapid pace of change are the ones required to find creative ways to refresh and relaunch a business. Yet the survey found these are the least valued by management. Can you imagine how the people behind some of Australia's most successful businesses would rank themselves for the skills on the list? Like the young pair behind Atlassian, ten years ago a start up now worth $3.5billion. Or Boost Juice, Cochlear or Challenger, Seek or Xero. How important to their success are the more creative skills most managers in the survey dismiss?

Creative thinking skills

Innovates

Champions change

Connects the group to the outside world

Establishes stretch goals

Practices self-development

You may be interested to see evidence of how creative thinking adds value in this time of digital disruption. UNO helps challenger brands grow by encouraging and mentoring these creative skills that most managers have underutilised. Download our formula for growing challenger brands here.

UNO's one time client at Choice Christopher Zinn explains more on the new influence of the determined consumer. 

Want to see where marketing is headed?

Technology is changing everything in our world. Marketing isn't just following the trends, today marketers are actually more likely to be using new technologies to drive change within businesses than the IT department.

I wrote recently that Gartner has found the average CMO now spends more on IT than the CIO. It's all about understanding what the customer wants, then finding what technology can now do to give it to them.

Big Data driven future for marketers

Here is a chart I came across that helps explain where we are today and where we are heading. Sooner rather than later.

Just click for a bigger view of the future of marketing.

Want a strong brand? Here's one we prepared earlier

What's in a brand name?

Money in the bank if you choose the right one, or an uphill battle and wasted dollars if you get it wrong.

Your business is your baby, and just like your first child, choosing a name can be fraught. Rather than show stats or a share a list of "most popular brand names of 2014" or cherry picked research to explain the pros and cons of what makes a good brand, I'm going to share 30+ years of trial and error and what it's shown me actually works in the real world. Not just what sounds good when shared with your spouse when working through the choices lying in bed late at night.

How a brand name change delievered a 3000% return

City Mutual had been around for over 100 years, yet onlythan 2 in 100 Australians recognised it. Three years later it was the best known investment and insurance group after AMP, having changed it's name to Capita.

Buying IBM means you won't get fired

Managers for decades have filled tenders, often at higher prices, knowing the board would never question the decision. Every time a client comes to me saying they want to call their business a series of initials they quickly use IBM as an example of why it will work. You can forgive their missunderstanding of what makes a brand. Unless your over 100 years of age you would necessarily know International Business Machines gained it's reputation for deivering reliable and ofte leading edge typewriters and for fifty years before it abreviated it's name to the initials that sat kneatly in the corner of millions of machines in office desks around the world. Today they business is in consulting, so Business Machines wouldn't be apt.

How to make a splash

Local businesses need to think of global consequences

When IFX Markets, a UK listed financial services business wanted to test market a business model in Australia for global roll out, the question of the right name came up very early in discussions.

Have Aussies forgotten how to make things?

If you're anything like me, you enjoy a weekend trip to Bunnings. Today there are more things to buy than ever, for less than when our fathers took us to the local hardware decades ago. Where once tools and taps and barrows and bolts were manufactured in Australia, most of this stuff is made in China.

Most of us would agree Australia's manufacturing sector has been destroyed by cheap Chinese imports. What hope is there for Australian made? With the help of some lateral thinking, maybe more than most think.

The end of the made in China boom?

Robert Gottliebsen reports China's remarkable gains in productivity and standards of living were all achieved with borrowed capital and technology. Alan Greenspan points out that no Chinese companies feature on the annual lists of the world's most innovative companies -- nearly half of those lists are made up of American companies. This is leading to a narrowing productivity gap between China and the US, which is putting serious pressure on the Chinese economy.

That's right, don't underestimate the power of first world creative thinking when matched against the cheap cost of third world manual labour. Here are a couple of examples from my dealings over the last year.

Australia leads the world in compression fabric design

I remember twenty years ago most Australian clothing manufacturers closed their local factories and set up workshops in Fiji where labour was cheap. Now most clothes sold here, even in stores like Zara, are made in China or Pakistan by one suspects slave labour. Yet in some areas of fashion we continue to lead the world.

Our client Quick Response is a local family business of almost 20 years who are still designing and making swimwear and compression garments locally. What's more, they manufacture using Australian made fabric.

In fact Australian compression fabric is the most technologically advanced in the world. It's the result of research and innovation that over the years has been tried and tested by our champion swimmers in those body hugging suits.

UNO have built an e-commerce site so you can buy the world's-best QRS compression garments direct, for less than sports brands that are usually made in China and Indonesian from inferior fabric.

Still open: a local manufacturer of timber shutters

Thirteen years ago Open Shutters was one of UNO's foundation clients. While cheap Chinese shutters have decimated most local manufacturers, Open continue to do business by concentrating on innovation. An obsession with quality design, investing in advanced machinery and only using sustainable timbers continues set them apart.

While white paint may disguise the compromises of Chinese made shutters in the short term, having been in the market now for several years they are proving to peel, bow, crack and break. The fact Open's product is built to last sees them gaining repeat sales over two decades on. What really makes the biggest difference is the way Open think:

What truly lifts them to the top of their category in the world is the design thinking process they apply in everything they do. When suppliers tell local architects or designers their ideas aren't possible, Open finds a creative way to deliver.

Could robots save Australian manufacturing

If you still doubt the power of creative thinking over cheap labour, consider this. Last year McKinsey released a list of the things that would change the business world. Near the top of the list was advanced robotics: robots with better and better senses, dexterity and intelligence that can automate tasks or help humans or even operate on us more effectively than... humans.

To quote the numbers:
• 170%: growth in sales of industrial robots 2009-2011,
• 320 million: manufacturing workers (12% of global workforce), and
• $2-3 million: cost of the 250 million annual major surgeries.

Here's what robots could do:
"Advances could make it practical to substitute robots for human labor in more manufacturing tasks, as well as in a growing number of service jobs, such as cleaning and maintenance. This technology could also enable new types of surgical robots."

Closer to home, when I underwent keyhole surgery a few months back, I could have chosen to be operated on by a robot designed in the US for remote controlled surgery on the battlefield. My gap cover wasn't enough to cover the extra cost, but the cost gap will quickly close. It's another reminder the changes in our lives will more likely be shaped by innovation than the global oversupply of cheap labour.

If you are a manufacturer the message is clear, forget cost cutting, start thinking and get marketing.

Read more on how to rethink your business.

Perception or Reality? Customers now decide

Over 50% of people don’t trust financial advisers. So I was told on the news last night. If you have ever been to see an advisor you’ve probably come away with the perception that they aren’t telling you everything straight. Commbank’s multi-million dollar financial planning scandal has proved perception IS reality when it comes to advisors.

For decades when a business advertises a product, whether baked beans or an investment, the words and claims made are open to scrutiny and have to be THE TRUTH. You have to deliver on the promise or you are liable under a number of ad standards, ASIC and ACCC rules. If you sell a financial product face-to-face most of these rules don’t seem to apply or be enforced.

Big 4 Banks still traditional marketers

What the big 4 banks and AMP have got away with is a classic exercise in traditional marketing methodology – control the distribution channel and you control both pricing and product. By using different brands they have been able to sell the same products to an unsuspecting public. Most people haven't realised 80% of advisors work for groups owned or aligned with just 5 product providers. 

Most people think they are seeking financial advice, when what they are getting is a sales pitch. How can anyone be given genuine choice when of 18,000 advisors only 31 are truly independent? We’ve all been buying Home Brand super for years and haven’t known it. Here is a list of just some of the hundreds of “brands” just 5 providers have sold their own products under:

Cavendish  AMP

Charter Financial Planning  AMP

Garrisons AMP

Genesys  AMP

Hillross Financial Planning AMP

Ipac AMP

Avanteos  Commonwealth Bank

Colonial First State  Commonwealth Bank

Commonwealth Financial Planning Commonwealth Bank

Count Financial  Commonwealth Bank

Financial Wisdom  Commonwealth Bank

Witaker McNaught  Commonwealth Bank

Apogee  NAB

Garvan Financial Planning  NAB

Godfrey Pembroke  NAB

Lend Lease Financial Planning  NAB

Meritum Financial  NAB

MLC  NAB

Elders Financial Planning  ANZ

Financial Services Partners  ANZ

Millenium3 ANZ

OnePath  ANZ

RI Advice (RetireInvest) ANZ 

Sentry  ANZ

Asgard   Westpac

BT  Westpac

Pact Accountants Investment Group  Westpac

KPMG Financial Planning   Westpac

Securitor Financial Group  Westpac

A couple of rogue CommBank advisors who ripped off investors for millions is just the tip of the iceberg of poor brand values. Ian Narev says the business won’t suffer. I suggest the era of brand equity built upon decades of million dollar perception-shaping advertising is over. The Internet has democratised the share of mind of customers. Does Narev not understand this? Instead of changing his business model he returned from holidays to push the button on a million+ dollar ad campaign trying to reassure customers they are fixing things. This old school reaction won't preserve brand equity long term. Here’s proof.

Try Googling CommBank financial planner. This is the result I got:

Last week we saw the government roll back the FoFA laws that were supposed to make hidden and trailing commissions illegal. Despite some wordy amendments from Clive Palmer, there is still no ironclad law that insists advisors can’t sell you a product because they get a kickback, not because it’s the very best choice for you.

Challenger brands will win with customer centric marketing

Legislation may not stop the consumer unfriendly practices of big banks. Social media and the empowered consumer will. And new technologies will see challenger brands that build financial product and service offers around what customers actually want will grow at their expense. Coles new deal with GE Capital to offer loans is just the start. I'll leave the last word to a consumer active on social media:

You are 31 times more likely to win lotto than click on a banner ad

Here are the stats that show why banner ads deliver the lowest ROI in the digital marketing mix.

1. Over 5.3 trillion display ads were served to U.S. users last year. (ComScore)
2. That’s 1 trillion more than 2009. (ComScore)
3. The typical Internet user is served 1,707 banner ads per month. (Comscore)
4. Click-through rates are .1 percent. (DoubleClick)
5. The 468 x 60 banner has a .04 percent click rate. (DoubleClick)
6. An estimated 31 percent of ad impressions can’t be viewed by users. (Comscore)
7. The display advertising Lumascape has 318 logos. (Luma Partners)
8. 8 percent of Internet users account for 85 percent of clicks. (ComScore)
9. Up to 50 percent of clicks on mobile banner ads are accidental. (GoldSpot Media)
10. Mobile CPMs are 75 cents. (Kleiner Perkins)
11. You’re 471 times more likely to survive a plane crash than click a banner ad. (Solve Media)
12. 15 percent of people trust banner ads completely or somewhat, compared to 29 percent for TV ads. (eMarketer)
13. 34 percent don’t trust banner ads at all or much, compared to 26 percent for magazine ads. (eMarketer)
14. 25-34-year olds see 2,094 banner ads per month. (ComScore)
15. 445 different advertisers delivered more than a billion banner ads in 2012. (ComScore)

Put simply, banner ads don't work

Remember these figures next time a media sales rep tries to sell you a banner ad campaign. Even if it’s free it may not be worth the effort, you’re 31 times more likely to win Lotto.

The A to Z of digital acronyms

Every industry has its acronyms. With this list you will be prepared when dealing with people who speak digital:

AIDA - Attention, Interest, Desire, Action

AJAX - Asynchronous Javascript and XML

API - Application program interface

AOV - Average order value

AR - Augmented reality

ASP - Application service provider

ATD - Agency trading desk

B2B - Business to business

B2C - Business to consumer

CIO- Chief information officer

CLV - Customer lifetime value

CMS - Content management system

CPA - Cost per acquisition / action

CPC - Cost per click

CPL - Cost per lead

CPM - Cost per thousand

CPV - Cost per view (see also PPV)

CR - Conversion rate

CRM - Customer relationship management

CRO - Conversion rate optimisation

CSS - Cascading style sheets 

CTA - Call to action

CTR - Click-through rate

CX - Customer experience

DM - Direct mail (or 'Direct message', in Twitter circles)

DMP - Data management platform

DNS - Domain name system

DR - Direct response

DSP - Demand-side platform

ECPM - Effective CPM

EPC - Earnings per click

EPM - Earnings per thousand

ESP - Email service provider

FAQs - Frequently asked questions

FB - Facebook

FBML - Facebook Markup Language

FTP - File transfer protocol

GA - Google Analytics

HIPPO - Highest paid person's opinion

HTML – Hyper Text Markup Language

HTTP - Hyper Text Transfer Protocol

HTTPS - Hyper Text Transfer Protocol Secure

IM - Instant Messaging

IMAP - Internet Message Access Protocol

IP - Intellectual property (or 'Internet Protocol')

IPTV - Internet protocol television

ISP - Internet service provider

KPI - Key performance indicator

LTV - Lifetime value

MoM - Month on month

MLM - Multi-level marketing

MVT - Multivariate testing

OEM - Original equipment manufacturer

OS - Operating system (sometimes this is used for 'open source')

PHP - PHP Hypertext Preprocessor

POP- Point of purchase

POS - Point of sale

PPC - Pay per click

PPL - Pay per lead

PPV - Pay per view

PR – Page rank

PV – Page views

QA - Quality assurance

QR Code - Quick response code

QS - Quality score

RFI - Request for information

RFP - Request for proposal

ROI - Return on investment

RON - Run of network

ROR - Ruby on Rails 

ROS - Run of site

RSS - Really Simple Syndication

RT - Retweet

RTB - Real time bidding

RTD - Real time data

S2S - Server to server

SaaS - Software as a service

SEM - Search engine marketing

SEO - Search engine optimisation

SERP - Search engine results page

SLA - Service level agreement

SM - Social media

SME - Small / medium enterprise. (aka SMB = ‘business’)

SMM - Social media marketing

SMO - Social media optimisation

SMP - Social media platform

SMS - Short message service

SOV - Share of voice

SOW - Statement of work

SSL - Secure Sockets Layer

SSP - Supply-side platform

SWOT - Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats

TLD - Top level domain

TOS - Terms of service

UCD - User-centric design

UI - User interface

UGC - User-generated content

URL - Uniform resource locator

USP - Unique selling proposition

UV - Unique visitor

UX - User experience

VOD - Video on demand

VM - Viral marketing

WC – Week commencing

WOMM - Word of mouth marketing

WYSIWYG - What you see is what you get

YOY - Year on year

YTD - Year to date

XML - Extensible Markup Language

I'm sure we've missed a few. Feel free to add your favourites in the comment box.

Where would you advertise if it was YOUR money?

I read recently, most entrepreneurs who are successful focus on realising their business concepts as well and as fast as they can. Worrying about how much money they will make comes a distant second.

Entrepreneurs focus on what the customer needs. The financial rewards follow if they have developed something that truly creates added value for their customers.

The advice industry is different. Advisors focus on what the customer will pay. Financial advisors charge you a percentage of what you have to invest. Not according to how they add value at the end of the financial year, which is what you actually need.

Last year the ASIC mystery shop of 64 financial advisors found only 2 gave “good” advice. 62 gave generic or bad advice, generally in line with their own interests, not the customers. While there’s no regulator doing mystery shopping of ad agencies or media shops, I suspect marketing services “advisors” wouldn’t score much better.

Digital media is commission driven

Media sales is still predominantly based on a cut of what you spend, not a share of your return on investment. Online ad-sales is the same model, just with a bigger margin from your spend. Some online adspace aggregators mark up inventory by 60%. For a 60% markup their computer serving of your ads has very little value add, let alone quality control. Look at this as an example of inappropriate adexchange placement – an ad for the Maquarie Graduate School of Management targeting women:
 

Every medium is out to convince you that their category is the best way to spend your money. They will always have a pie chart to prove it. It’s in their interest to have you spend more of your marketing pie with them. This will increase their commission, irrespective of whether it will increase your return.

For instance, Google Adwords looks a cheap way to buy eyeballs. But if your Adwords campaigner gets into a bidding war for the most popular keywords, you’ll spend more than the same number of leads from less popular search terms. Does the supplier care?

You might think the answer is to use media specialists who charge by time. Like lawyers, they’ll make more the longer their process drags on. More meetings, less decisions, the bigger your bill.

There are now more types of specialists than ever, each fighting for a bigger share of your budget – SEO, PPC, SEM, online content, online ads, email lists, data analysts, mobile, apps, ambient, ambush, experiential, waterproof stickers on urinals…

Which mediums are actually best for your business challenge?

I recommend looking at where to spend a clients’ money from this perspective:

Synergy comes from the right mix, at the right time, with the right creative message. Beware commission driven specialists selling one solution to solve every problem. You’ll get less than you pay for.

Glenn Mabbott
Creative Director & Principal
UNOmarcomms

This article first appeared in AdNews

Survey reveals SMEs fail to measure ROI of online ads

A Yellow Pages survey of 1,800 Australian business owners* has found 69% of small and medium enterprises don’t measure the return on their online ad spend. What’s really surprising in this era of accountability is the finding that only one in 10 base their decisions on where to advertise on the ROI delivered.

What amazes me is the disconnect between business owners increasing desire to do more with less and the missed opportunities these findings reveal.

Advertisers keep telling me they love advertising online because it’s so much cheaper than traditional media. It might be cheaper to buy an adword campaign than a press ad, but are they getting a better return from those clicks?

Do you know which half of your advertising works?

The age-old saying “I know only half my advertising works, if only I knew which half” is just as true of online ad spending as off. The good news is it’s much easier to measure ROI of online marketing than the kinds of activities you used in the past. New technology makes it possible to know what works online and why. Business Intelligence means your spending can truly become an investment with predictable returns.

So if you count yourself amongst the majority of SMEs that don’t have a digital business strategy, maybe you should make it a priority to develop one. After all, there aren’t many things you can do so quickly and effectively that will leave the majority of your competitors behind.

How to measure your marketing ROI

New technologies have also made it much easier to track the performance of your offline advertising and promotion activities. We recently completed another test market campaign for an FMCG customer. In the past it was only major brands that could afford to put in place the kinds of tools needed to measure the ROI of integrated campaigns. Today even challenger brands can track the performance of programs that largely use traditional media because online research, scan data, real time field force reporting and analytics tools are no longer cost prohibitive.

The test and learn approach we have taken with this brand over the last few years has helped lift them above the pack. From being one of half a dozen small players competing for share against a long established multinational, our client is now a clear number 2 in their category. Do you know how much of your marcomms budget is working? There are no excuses because now you can.

* Survey published December 2010

What you don't know will hurt your business. Especially those unknown unknowns

"There are known knowns; there are things we know we know.

We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say, we know there are some things we do not know. 

But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don’t know we don’t know."

While you may not like his politics, this famous quote from Donald Rumsfeld preceding the US invasion of Iraq perfectly sums up the dilemma faced by business owners today.

People are punch drunk from 5 years of relentless financial destruction of the world’s capital markets. Meanwhile, technology, and especially the digitisation of the world, has seen the pace of change of commerce reach incomprehensible pace. Is it any wonder business managers are floundering?

Challenger brands are making the most of this time of change to gain an advantage over competitors

Many business owners still think they can wait things out until things return to “normal.” What they don't know is the new model for success demands the ability to try new things, quickly and often.

Renee Todres heads a team of digital specialists at Tipping Point that have been helping businesses transform often complex transactions with their customers into simple ones. From BT to Elle Bache, once complicated business processes are being replaced with simple, intuitive interactions that make customers feel in control. Renee makes a wonderful observation –
"to learn you need to listen to yourself less."

Tipping Points approach is to add value by finding new insights. One way to succeed today is to recognise the limitations of your known knowns. Then seek out specialists that can help you discover the unknown unknowns. Get to know the ones that can help improve your position against your competition. And have the confidence to act on those new insights knowing the biggest threat to businesses today is business as usual. The Aussie attitude that she’ll be right now almost certainly guarantees failure.

I'm not suggesting spending all your energies on research. We’ve all seen managers fall into the paralysis by over-analysis trap. Too much data can actually hinder making effective business decisions. According to IBM’s 2012 global survey of 1700 CEOs, asking customers what matters to them is now more useful than financial analysis.

"Of course we need information and insight, but what we need most is the capability to act on it."
Unit head, Government, Hong Kong

In the words of Boston Consulting, today in business “the spoils go to the nimble.” We have found our challenger brand clients are winning by trying new and interesting things, fast and often. In the past you needed big budgets and big balls to try something different. There are now technologies that allow marketers to test new strategies while limiting financial risks.

As Renee and other niche specialists have shown me, it’s surprising how much there is to know that the big brands don’t, simply because they aren't looking. 

All those for firing the Marketing Managers? Any against?

When they leave the office for the holidays, many marketing managers won’t realise their role may be restructured out of existence in the New Year. Over the Christmas break, CEOs around the country will be re-appraising who is an expendable cost to the business, versus who is an income generator.

Who will defend so many marketing managers when the case that has been building against them throughout 2012 is so strong?

Here is my snapshot of some of the evidence CEOs may be considering as they weigh up whether to fire their marketing managers: 

Evidence A 

Many of the tasks that CEOs thought only marketing managers could do can now be Googled. From 99 Designs to freelancer.com any CEO can buy marketing stuff cheap. Whether it’s designing websites or mailers, SEO or adwords, printing or promotions, everything is just a keyword search away. Who cares if you don’t know which half of your advertising works now you can buy it direct at third world prices?

Evidence B 

According to this year's Roy Morgan annual professions ranking, marketers have failed again to rise much above used car salesmen. What CEO wants someone with less credibility than a real estate agent on their team? Consider this evidence alongside the growth in Australia of the casual workforce and outsourcing generally.

If you must have a marketing manager, why not buy by the hour, save on fixed and overhead costs.

Evidence C 

CEOs have never believed marketers anyway. Fornaise regional survey of CEOs in 2011 found 75% did not value marketing managers opinions at a board level. In July this year the number had increased to 80%.

In November a follow up survey found seven in 10 CEOs hold themselves "somewhat responsible" for marketers’ poor perceived business performance because they have given up on holding their marketing managers accountable. CEOs gave up measuring the performance of their marketing managers. If it isn’t measurable, it won’t be long before the accountants decide marketing managers are an expensive indulgence a lean 21st century business can do without.

Evidence D

Business confidence is at it’s lowest level for four years. More companies went out of business in Australia in the last quarter than any other.

"She’ll be right" is now more wrong than ever. CEOs will have to change the way their business operates to survive. If they don’t know what marketing managers do, it’s an easy place for them to start cutting. As AdNews reported, one recruiter said recently, “companies want to hire revenue generators, and see marketers as passengers not drivers.“

Evidence E

How many CEOs actually know what marketing is? Consider one of the 4 Ps of marketing, price. In the FMCG industry, paying a rebate to Woolworths for a price promotion is still considered a marketing investment, not the sales tool it is.

Evidence F

Consider the other 3 Ps as they apply to businesses today. When do CEOs involve marketing managers in product development, or distribution innovation, or the building of a Business Intelligence driven CRM program? These new silos now fall under Strategy and Innovation Manager or the Supply Chain and Technology Integration Manager or the Chief Information Officer.

Is there a case for marketing managers? 

The evidence doesn’t look good if the CEO doesn’t realise marketing managers can add value by thinking across silos. enabling the parts to work in synergy.

The Fornaise study found CEOs “think marketers have continuously failed to unquestionably and consistently prove in the boardroom that their marketing strategies, activities and campaigns generated actual business growth.”

To grow today you have to become a successful challenger brand. To be relevant today marketers have to champion at the board level the power of marketing to create a challenger brand.

If marketers aren’t in the boardroom, either the accountants, the salesmen, even the IT department will contend they need more of the budget to grow the business. Why not take it from the marketing pot, it’s just an artsy fartsy waste of money after all? Isn’t it?               

12 days of vintage Christmas ads

Have you heard about the uproar surrounding the latest 'sexist' Christmas ad for ASDA in the UK? Here's your chance in case you missed it.

It seems that history is repeating? Here's a fun look at UNO's 12 days of vintage Christmas ads. They certainly gave us a few laughs! 

On the 1st day: What more could a girl ask for?!

On the 2nd day: Should you be tempted to over indulge...

On the 3rd day: What could it be?

On the 4th day: It's the thought that counts!

On the 5th day: The perfect stocking filler!

On the 6th day: Foam filled fun for all the family!

On the 7th day: Taking care of Christmas!

On the 8th day: A shame they didn't make them for dogs too?

On the 9th day: Say it with... spoons?

On the 10th day: We all know that Santa wears red and white because...

On the 11th day: We're sure ASDA would approve!

On the 12th day: Relax in the comfort of your own home

Oh what the heck! One more!

Big businesses' loss can be your gain

In the last few weeks business owners have been warned by the head of one of Australia’s biggest mining corporations that if we don’t change our business models we will die.

So who do business owners turn to for advice? In AdNews the marketing head of one of the big 4 banks reveals agencies don’t get digital. And the CEO of one of the biggest media planners in the country said "anyone in the media industry who claims they know what is happening is lying."

How many consultants does it take to change a light bulb?

Too late, fibre optics and LEDs have changed the market.

Every manager who has grown a business understands the value of seeking advice from specialists, you can’t be an expert at everything. Today we have the added problem that most so-called experts learnt their skills pre-Internet. Most business coaches are dinosaurs, as the world of commerce changes at ever increasing pace, conventional methods won’t save your business if the customer has evolved to a new way of life.

Think biz is tough? It’s even tougher for big businesses

Don’t panic. Unless you are number 1 in your category, you have less to lose by changing the way you play to fit in with the new rules that are being written by the customer. If you are a mid sized business today you have an advantage that in the past was a handicap. Yes, smaller is more nimble. Big businesses with big investments in infrastructure, systems and sunk costs can’t easily re-invent themselves. Think of all those silos of managers in big companies who have to hang in there for another 5 years because their super was decimated. They are a dead weight that slows down change.

Companies falling out of the top 3 in a given year:

Market share leaders that are the profitability leaders:

Forget the past, where’s the future profit coming from?

Most likely from something you are good at now, but not focused on. If you are a mid market player and still in business, you obviously have enough retained knowledge to draw on. Here are some examples of where UNO's clients have found profit opportunities:

• For a manufacturer it was cutting out the wholesalers.
• For a premium winemaker it is leaving Coles and Woollies to the major brands and growing high margin club membership.
• For a financial services B2B supplier it is repackaging bite-sized insights for the consumer market.

Today more than ever, get to know those who know 

What you most need now is a trusted advisor who can draw upon a network of today’s specialists. To grow today, you need to re-invent your model, refresh your offer and relaunch by integrating traditional and new ways to market.

Forget incremental improvements. A few percent saved on input costs and a couple more from efficiency gains won’t save you when the competition pockets a whopping 30%+ of margin by removing an entire step in the route to market.

There’s an idea. Better to do it now, or be done over?               

For a better career, get a life as a sponge

Many people in marketing seem to think they are judged on what they will do this week, while many managers think it’s about avoiding mistakes by doing very little. Rather than worry about what others may think of your actions/inactions in the short term, a recent conversation with a self-made squillionare reminded me of what it takes to become successful in business life. It’s not about you – soak up other people’s experiences.

Curiosity is the key 

This founder of many businesses was as keen to ask questions about my challenges, as I was to learn about his successes.

Creative people continue to take the passive role of waiting for a brief, hoping the application of their current skills to their next project will bring the recognition they deserve. Meanwhile marketing managers act like thought police, determined to minimise all risks on their watch. So the brief ends up something like this: do something safe, measurable (as in lets make sure there are no nasty surprises), something a bit like someone else has already done, and all for less than it cost last time. This lack of desire to explore the unknown is killing creativity in Australia. Yet it’s creativity that builds wealth. Avoiding risk guarantees smaller returns, or none at all. Cutting margins does not create wealth, it just means you’ll spend your way to mediocrity a bit slower.

Today for a business to thrive it has to be a challenger brand. That’s an old company doing things in a different way, or a new one doing new and interesting things. Being a challenger is not about fine-tuning or polishing what you’ve always done. A business that’s in a well-worn smooth groove, just like a career, soon discovers it’s actually in a rut, going the wrong way. New isn’t always better, but better is always new.

If you’re curious to know what it takes to be better at what you do, you’ll do better than your peers. Curiousity, the squillionare says in one of his many books, is what it takes to succeed. It’s more than just appreciating that you don’t know everything. It’s wanting to know what Donald Rumsfeld memorably described as “the unknown unknowns.” Rather than selectively listening to those around you that you feel comfortable with, avoid making bad decisions by seeking out the wisdom beyond your network.

If you’re an art director, it’s time you hung around with some media gurus, marketing managers with entrepreneurs, accountants with digital user experience designers. Innovation after all comes from outside an industry, it’s not found fiddling around with what your category already does. And today if you don’t innovate you and the business will die.

I’ve often explained my life as that of a sponge. From childhood I wanted to know everything about everything. As I’ve met people with passions for things I know nothing about I’ve soaked up drops of wisdom. You’d be surprised what lateral connections from my sodden sponge can draw just the right drop, at the right time, to create an innovative answer. Whatever your role or experience, take every opportunity to learn from others. It helps to be open about your ignorance in front of experts. I’m always asking the silly questions. I usually find if they really are experts, they will gladly share their wisdom. Soak it up.               

What's more important to CEOs - financial analysis, or customer insight?

We now work in a world awash with data. But too much data can actually hinder making effective business decisions. According to IBM’s 2012 global survey of 1700 CEOs, asking customers what matters to them is now more useful than financial analysis. 

"This is now a continuous feedback kind of world, and we need the organizational nimbleness to respond."

CEO, Financial Markets, USA

"Of course we need information and insight, but what we need most is the capability to act on it."

Unit head, Government, Hong Kong

So how can you get to know your customers better? While there is no substitute for face-to-face, the survey found CEOs of outperforming businesses believe social media is the next best way to gather insights. More importantly, these insights are helping them take action.

In the words of Boston Consulting, today in business "the spoils go to the nimble."