Get social media right or "you're stuffed"

Every time you use something that you aren't being charged for, remind yourself, it's because you are the product. SMH.com.au, LinkedIn, Facebook, Pinterest all let you read and/or post for free because they are making money out of YOU. Businesses of all kinds are constantly gathering data from you and about you and your contacts most of the time you do something digitally. Facebook can now access your phone’s microphone to eavesdrop on what you are listening/watching while you post an update.

The upside is you will be served ads or content or search results that have been vetted just for you. The downside if you're marketing your own business online is you have to recognise the average person will increasingly expect to receive only what they care about.

Social marketing 101: What's in it for your customer?

As Jane Caro told a room full of online marketers recently, people are "entirely able to screen you out no matter how much money you put behind (your message.)

“If the message is not relevant, if the message doesn’t mean anything to them, you’re stuffed.

“the power has moved from those people with large pockets to the population at large. But you can have no money at all and send a Tweet that resonates and takes off like wildfire and suddenly you’re famous.”

Research by McKinseys has shown businesses have found the primary benefit of embracing social media is the ability to open a dialogue with customers and actually listen to what customers want. Not talk at them like a brochure, but understand what they care about and respond, or learn and move on. Here's a reminder of the simple etiquette of doing a business on the Itnerweb.

3 rules of social media engagement: the 3 Rs

To participate in social media as a representative of an organistion or company it is important to remember 3 rules.

Be clear about who you are representing, take personal responsibility for ensuring that any references to your company are factually correct and accurate and do not breach confidentiality requirements, and show respect for the individuals and communities with which you interact.

Remember, you are personally responsible for the content of the posts online. If employing a ghost writer, it is your responsibility to sign off on final content. Ensure any information about your products and services that you provide is true and factually accurate.

Respect copyright, privacy, financial disclosure and other applicable laws when publishing on social media platforms.

If you break the law you may also be personally liable.

There is no best way to compete

Remember that scene with Steve Martin ordering coffee L.A. style – "a half double decaf decaffeinated half caf... with a twist of lemon." (The video is at the end for you to enjoy.) It seems every single decision we now make throughout the day comes with an endless number of choices.

So it came as no surprise when a global a marketing guru presented research to the World Business Forum in Sydney that proves, in industry after industry, there is no single best way to compete.

How to differentiate your brand today

The worst mistake in strategy is to compete with rivals on the same dimensions, Professor Michael Porter says. The man who’s made strategy his life work says many businesses still get confused around the definition of the concept of differentiation, and that even trying to be ‘the best’ means a business is starting in the wrong place strategically.

Porter points out "we all know it’s impossible to meet every need of every customer uniquely well. That’s impossible. There’s no one way to deliver value.

“Strategy starts with a notion that the fundamental question is not how to be the best, it’s actually how to deliver something unique. To the customers you’re choosing to serve. Not because what you’re doing is ‘the best’ but because what you’re doing is delivering distinctive value.

Strategy is about being unique. That’s ultimately what all successful companies are able to achieve for some period of time."

The formula for growing challenger brands

If today we are spoiled for choice, it follows the prospective customers for our business are too. So instead of seeking some magic wand global answer, a better strategy is to identify one thing people you're trying to serve actually care about. Something that you're good at delivering. Finding your mojo is the fundamental starting point in our formula for growing challenger brands.

What happens when the CMO spends more on IT than the CIO

The head of marketing will soon be spending more on IT than the head of IT, so a recent study by Gartner found. Last week at the annual adfest in Cannes, Ogilvy's top creative warned of how too much faith was being put into data and not enough into ideas. This was resulting in well planned and placed ads that don't actually achieve much.

Where is the real value to be found in marketing?

The more things change the more they stay the same. The problem in the past was IT managers spent a fortune, first on hardware and then software to sytemise the running of the business. Whether or not the customers' experience was improved was not the concern of the CIO. You only had to dial 3 for support to know that. The main focus of the CIO was all about having bragging rights his IT budget was bigger than the competitors'.

Now we are seeing marketing managers playing the same game, "my Big Data budget is bigger than yours." Businesses are paying more and more to collect big brother levels of information on people. You've experienced the result like everyone else – being hit with ads on Facebook when all you want to do is see a picture of a friend's fishing trip. This may be how Zuckerberg will try to make an earn for shareholders, it isn't the road to marketing Nirvana. Just like the IT managers of the past, what the customer wants once again isn't the focus.

The constant here is managers within the business concentrating on the business of the business, rather than looking for ways to make a customer's life better. You probably recognise the trap, I fell for it. For several years I paid too much time and money on experienced professional staff and IT consultants to implement and manage programs to systemise my business. None of it added to the power of connecting and motivating, inspiring or creating. It was money spent on smooth bureaucracy for neatness sake and failed to grow my customers' businesses, nor consequently my own.

Rational Vs emotional marketing approach

"Investment" in IT has always been a rational spreadsheet sell to the chief decision maker. How often have you witnessed a marketing department asking for a "brand building" budget lose out to the CIO who could promise a guaranteed ROI from some new IT? Problem is marketers seem to be giving up the fight at the board level for using emotion to connect with customers, instead choosing the easy route of asking for funding for data. Spend X get Y. Yet economic modelling consistently shows the customer is innately irrational, human beings are pre-programmed that way. This is at the heart of getting the best marketing ROI.

Your customers are more emotional when making purchase decisions than rational

The influential role of emotion in consumer behavior is well documented, here is a summary by Antonio Damasio, professor of neuroscience at the University of Southern California –

• MRI neuro-imagery shows that when evaluating brands, consumers primarily use emotions (personal feelings and experiences) rather than information (brand attributes, features, and facts).
• Advertising research reveals that emotional response to an ad has far greater influence on a consumer’s reported intent to buy a product than does the ad’s content – by a factor of 3-to-1 for television commercials and 2-to-1 for print ads.
• Research conducted by the Advertising Research Foundation concluded that the emotion of “likeability” is the measure most predictive of whether an advertisement will increase a brand’s sales.
• Studies show that positive emotions toward a brand have far greater influence on consumer loyalty than trust and other judgments which are based on a brand’s attributes.

So it follows a business that concentrates on chasing efficiency by spending big on data risks failing to connect on the more powerful emotional level.

Challenger brands care most about what the customer thinks matters most

Challenger brands that actually care about what customers want are winning by using the Cloud to remove superfluous steps from the delivery of products and services, often without big IT budgets. One example I know intimately is an Australian first, UNOsmsf, Cloud based Self Managed Super.

The rational customer benefit: More choice, more control, lower fees. We'll be using an emotional truth to appeal to prospective clients: your fund can do better than your mates with more money who are paying through the nose for an average product the big banks want to sell them using big data.

Check out the superannuation challenger brand taking on the banks from the Cloud.

Top 5 biz management blunders

Have you read any of Robert Gottliebsen's recent articles on the impending 12 billion dollar plane crash coming our way? Australia's purchase of three squadrons of Joint Strike Fighters – 58 at over $100million each is a fine example of the 5 management blunders many businesses tend to make.

5 blunders for management to avoid (& tips on marketing)

Gottliebsen quoted Liberal senator Jensen, a scientist, explaining what a blunder the decision to purchase the JSF is proving to be. Here I paraphrase Robert, with my own warnings on the blunders to avoid when making decisions about marketing::

Rule 1 of management blunders

Ignore expert advice and go with your gut. A decade ago Australia's manager at the top, John Howard, ignored the advice of aviation experts and bought into the development of the JSF. In my experience, being told the CEO doesn't believe in marketing or paying for external advice is more common than finding a boss willing to admit where their expertise ends.

Rule 2 of management blunders

When you make a big decision, those who continue to oppose you need to be pushed aside -- everyone must get with the program. Creativity is stifled by group think, yet it's creative thinking that helps businesses compete on their own terms, rather than taking the category head on.

Rule 3 of management blunders

All staff involved in the decision are ‘looked after’. E.g. In the case of the JSF, Senator Jensen has studied carefully what happened and says "there are too many who get jobs with contractors where they have provided advice favouring that contractor's product.” Advertising is renowned for managers procuring from friends who are designers, family members who know photoshop and printers who give them tickets to the rugby.

Rule 4 of management blunders

Delay as long as possible in telling the people at the top that the decision is wrong. In corporations, big, sudden write-downs are often caused because management down the line keeps putting a good spin on the data to keep their jobs, until finally they have to confess. Or in my experience, they are found out long after they've moved on. One CEO didn't realise that for two years none of my proposals to fix their problems had ever been passed up to him by his marketing manager. It was only after firing the manager he discovered an email trail where my strategies and estimates had been constantly forwarded to her close friend, who was then being commissioned for services beyond their capability at far higher prices.

Rule number five

Obscure the costs with all sorts of creative accounting. In marketing and advertising, this is really easy when so many managers claim to know the cost of everything, when they actually don't understand the value of anything.

The common theme here is the tendency of management to throw staff at problems, at great long term cost, when trusting experts would be better for business.

Get onboard the online retail bandwagon: $14.9bn & racing

The idea that online retail is about discounts isn't in line with the facts. While margins might be tighter, e-commerce is no longer just about bargains and end-of-line clearances. The latest NAB Online Retail Sales Index shows just how broad Australian retailing has become. Daily Deals sites are stuck at 3% share. The biggest online sales growth stories now are in liquor and groceries.

Department stores and appliance retailers the big winners, or losers online?

The mainstreaming of e-commerce can be seen in the leadership of department store products with a whopping one third of online spending. Once slow to adopt, Myer now offers 119,000 individual products online.

Domestic operators still have the lion’s share of online sales at around 75%. Gerry Harvey’s call for a GST on foreign online sales is just noise when you consider he mostly sells homewares and appliances, the second largest online category. I don’t see Australia Post delivering washing machines bought from Best Buy New York via their online store as a threat to Gerry. The threat is internal, his stores are failing to add value to the sales process and Harvey Norman still doesn't appear to have a strategy to compete with local online challengers.

Challenger brands have an advantage online

If anything, e-commerce puts the power back into the hands of customers who want to deal direct with manufacturers. Australian challenger brands, when they make a product that locals actually want, can cut out the blood sucking Coles/Woollies duopoly and the Gerry Harvey’s.

When brands reinvest into marketing a portion of the retailer margins that going online cuts from the delivery chain, they can grow share long term. This way e-commerce becomes a WIN, WIN equation for brand and customer.

An example of this approach is the transformation of a traditional Australian designer manufacturer of compression and sportswear – Quick Response. UNO has helped them transform from a wholesaler at the mercy of retailers to a direct-to-consumer e-business. This challenger brand is now competing with SKINS, (the retail market leader with a high priced foreign made product), by offering superior Australian made garments direct online, at a better price. Check out the QRS compression online store.

The future for online retail marketing

While retail sales generally have been mostly flat, ABS figures show Australian’s spent 27% more online in the year to March than the year before.

The NAB online spend index doesn’t include online shopping paid for by Paypal, transfers or EFTPOS, so the 6.5% of all retail spending measured in the latest report to March 2014 is an underestimate of the reality. Marketers need to view online retail as a growing opportunity for current business growth, not just a nice to have in the future.

Source: National Australia Bank Online Retail Sales Index.

Truth in advertising?

Which professions are most trusted in 2014? Research shows the Australian public rate nurses 91% for ethics and honesty, once again at the top, whereas most professions don't rank well in the trust stakes at all.

No prizes for guessing who rates last at 3%, it's the same profession that has been at the bottom every year since Roy Morgan began their annual "Image of Professions" survey in 1986.

2014 rankings of professions for ethics and honesty 

1. Nurses
2. Pharmacists
3. Doctors
4. High Court Judges
5. Dentists
6. School teachers
7. Engineers
8. Police
9. Supreme Court Judges
10. University lecturers
11. Accountants
12. Bank managers
13. Lawyers
14. Ministers of religion
15. Public servants
16. Public opinion pollsters
17. Financial planners
18. Directors of public companies
19. TV reporters
20. Newspaper journalists
21. Business executives
22. Insurance brokers
23. Stock brokers
24. Talk-back radio hosts
25. State MPs
26. Federal MPs
27. Union leaders
28. Real estate agents
29. Advertising people
30. Car salesmen

Source: Roy Morgan annual 'Image of Professions' survey for 2014

Design Thinking makes more money than traditional business management

Since the GFC businesses and investors have struggled to find consistent ways to achieve double digit returns. You can continue to blame the shake out that the credit crunch brought down on our heads, or perhaps the current tough environment is the new normal. The new normal is a world where businesses and governments and media proprietors no longer have control. Everything has been digitised, and thanks to Google and global Internet access from mobile phones at low prices the slevers are now controlled by the public, your customers.

The last decade has seen what Deloitte term the era of Digital Disruption. In a paper last year they identified which Australian industries are facing a short fuse, big bang trashing of their business models. Traditional business models that could control supply and demand and charge a premium have dissappeared or in the case of Delloittes hit list of financial services and are about to.

The businesses that prosper will be those that can embrace the new digital normal. It is the business managers that apply design thinking to their entire way of operating that will survive. The good news for SMEs is they have eless to lose than corporations and also have the management structure to embrace change. The best thing about all this si design thinking makes more money for a business than traditional management approaches. Here are some figures on just how much more profitable design centric businesses have been since the GFC. 

Design Thinking has doubled the returns of companies across a range of industries

The Design Management Institute in the US worked together with Motiv Strategies to create a share market index for tracking the returns of businesses that have Design Thinking at the centre of the organisation. Called the Design Value Index, it shows the 15 rigorously-selected companies that understand the value of design beat the S&P Index by a whopping 228% over the last 10 years.

Who are these profit powerhouse businesses and what do they have in common?

Design is an integrated function across the entire enterprise; they invest in design and it shapes the way employees interact and report, management structure is flat or receptive to ideas; experienced design executives are given power to direct design activities; and there is a senior leadership-level commitment to design. Some of the companies on the list won’t surprise you – Apple, Coca-Cola, Walt Disney and Nike. Others might – Ford, Herman-Miller, IBM, Intuit, Newell-Rubbermaid, Procter & Gamble, Starbucks, Starwood, Steelcase, Target and Whirlpool.

Designers are lateral thinkers, utilise their creative leaps

The way designers think is much more open to ideas, random thoughts from diverse sources and then building on these. By starting with the question what does a customer want and what makes them happy the designer is liberating from current accepted practices within a business. They challenge all aspects, collaborating across all the people in a business from sales to complaints, production to procurement. Compare this to control and command structures, like the public service where you aren’t allowed to ask a superior a question let alone challenge what they believe is the way it’s always been done.

Change, rather than wait to be redundant. As Deloitte warns, redundancy is coming sooner rather than later.

Design Thinking makes more money than traditional business management

Since the GFC businesses and investors have struggled to find consistent ways to achieve double digit returns. You can continue to blame the shakeout that the credit crunch brought down on our heads, or accept that the current tough environment is the new normal. We now have to operate in a world where businesses and governments and media proprietors no longer have control. Everything has been digitised.

Thanks to Google the information levers are now controlled by the public. In other words, your customers now call the shots.

The last decade has seen what Deloitte term the era of Digital Disruption. In a paper last year they identified which Australian industries are facing a short fuse, big bang trashing of business models. Traditional business management techniques that could control supply and demand and charge a premium have disappeared. You can see from Deloitte's hit list, even industries not used to rapid change like financial services and arts and recreation are about to face significant disruption.

Deloitte's Digital Disruption map

The formula for small & medium business survival in this time of disruption

The businesses that prosper next year and beyond will be those that can embrace the new digital normal. It will be the business managers who apply design thinking to their entire way of operating that will survive. The good news for SMEs is they have less to lose than corporations and more flexibility in the management structure to embrace change.

SMEs are perfectly placed to become tomorrow's challenger brands. The best thing about all this is design thinking makes more money for a business than traditional management approaches. Here is a chart that shows just how much more profitable design-centric businesses have been since the GFC. 

Design Thinking has doubled the returns of companies across a range of industries

The Design Management Institute in the US worked together with Motiv Strategies to create a share market index for tracking the returns of businesses that have Design Thinking at the centre of the organisation. Called the Design Value Index, it shows the 15 rigorously-selected companies that understand the value of design beat the S&P Index by a whopping 228% over the last 10 years.

Who are these profit powerhouse businesses and what do they have in common?

Design is an integrated function across the entire enterprise; they invest in design and it shapes the way employees interact and report, management structure is flat or receptive to ideas; experienced design executives are given power to direct design activities; and there is a senior leadership-level commitment to design. Some of the companies on the list won’t surprise you – Apple, Coca-Cola, Walt Disney and Nike. Others might – Ford, Herman-Miller, IBM, Intuit, Newell-Rubbermaid, Procter & Gamble, Starbucks, Starwood, Steelcase, Target and Whirlpool.

Designers are lateral thinkers, utilise their creative leaps

The way designers think is much more open to ideas, random thoughts from diverse sources and then building on these. By starting with the question what does a customer want and what makes them happy the designer is liberating from current accepted practices within a business. They challenge all aspects, collaborating across all the people in a business from sales to complaints, production to procurement. Compare this to control and command structures, like the public service where you aren’t allowed to ask a superior a question let alone challenge what they believe is the way it’s always been done.

Change, rather than wait to be redundant. As Deloitte warns, a big bang of disruption is coming sooner rather than later for most businesses.

How do you lead your business in the Digital Age?

The answer is in the mail. Australia Post is over 204 years old, but that hasn’t stopped it making the most of the digitised world. At a presentation to business leaders at the AGSM Leading The Digital Enterprise event yesterday, I found Tracey Gosling, a director of Australia Post, the biggest surprise. While the usual suspects, like the Head of Policy at Facebook and an author on Innovation helped open the eyes of the bank managers and bureaucrats in the room to the way generation X and Y want to be treated at work, it was the true stories of change at Australia Post I found most useful.

What's the future for AusPost in a digitised world?

Tracey shared real examples of the often simple ways ordinary people in their business have made changes that have worked. They show us what can actually be achieved when the starting point is very grim. Which gives real hope for small and medium sized businesses that aren't as tied down by the inertia of a monopoly like AusPost.

Tracey painted a picture of a vast post office workforce laboring under the emotional burden of the fear of change. Imagine you were a postie, one of my schoolmates from 30 years ago still is. Imagine over the last decade the postie doing the daily rounds would feel the bag of mail on their back was lighter than the week before. And next week it will be lighter still as people stop posting letters. They'd be worrying when will the day come there is no mail to deliver and they're out of a job?

To survive Australia Post has to manage a bigger change to the way customers exchange information than past revolutions like telegraph to telephone, horse borne deliveries to airmail, phone to fax. The Internet has changed everything more significantly than any of those innovations. Manage the change they have.

To quote the Australia Post annual report: “For the 13th consecutive year, we met or exceeded all of the performance standards that relate to our community service obligations. We delivered 95.5 per cent of domestic letters on time or early (against our 94 per cent target) and we increased the number of postal outlets to 4,429 nationwide. Total revenue grew to $5.9 billion and our after-tax profit increased by 10.9 per cent to $311.9 million. This means net profit has grown 21 per cent per annum since we enacted our Future Ready transformation program."

What has AusPost changed to keep up? Nearly everything, they had to. Last year they lost $189 million on mail delivery. AusPost now makes more from servicing e-commerce businesses and other activities that didn’t exist just a decade ago. There are secure 24/7 Parcel Lockers within minutes drive of most homes for out of hours parcel deliveries, digital self serve kiosks in post shops and soon digital I.D. recognition software that will mean documents like banking applications and contracts won’t need signatures by hand.

If a bureaucracy can go digital, so can your business

These changes to a huge and diverse business are making sure it can remain competitive as digitisation changes the world. As with most things in business, change management is being enabled at Auspost from the top. CEO Ahmed Fahour is a case study in the new style of management required for the digital age – leadership by openness, not power. This infographic sums it up nicely.

View this image on Pinterest.

Here are some examples of how Ahmed Fahour has let go of control:

1. Let staff fail

Individuals in offices can change their methods behind the counter to see if it works better than current processes without asking prior permission from senior management. If it doesn’t work, no great loss. If it does make an improvement, it’s shared across the organisation.

2. Social media is for everyone

While most government departments still don’t allow social media or even Google to be used in the office, Fahour has let employees at every level of share an opinion on Facebook. Just a few years before only 2 people were officially given the role to manage social media, yet even then there were 15,000 conversations happening on social media each year amongst staff.

Businesses need to recognise they can’t control what staff want, or constantly roadblock how they want to do it. Indeed today, in the words of former Cisco Senior Director Martin Stewart-Weeks, "a network routes around an obstacle." It's the same with staff, they will go around you, or leave.

3. What does the customer want that they’re not getting?

To improve the way they can fulfill for e-commerce customers, staff who had never shopped online were encouraged to do so in work hours. This led to an understanding at many levels of post  employee of what online businesses do well and not so well, and discover what shoppers want from the whole order to delivery process. One consequent innovation is the 24/7 Parcel Locker, which means you don’t have to be at home to receive a valuable e-purchase.

4. What can you do that’s new?

Things are changing fast, so what you’ve always sold in the past is less likely to be as attractive to new customers tomorrow. Again, take inspiration from the top postie:

“We capitalised on the boom in online shopping with the Parcel & Express Services segment earning profit of $354.8 million, on the back of 9.3 per cent growth in domestic parcel volumes. And, despite difficult retailing conditions, Retail Services profit again grew to $200.6 million, mainly through adding new financial and identity services.”

“Initiatives are all focused on capturing our immediate customer growth opportunities in the digital economy – especially in e-commerce, digital communications and trusted services.”

We are constantly exploring the new possibilities with our clients, it's how we help to keep them growing as successful challenger brands.

What if consumers were as determined as the businesses they dealt with?

Making meaningful comparisons as a consumer is challenging, especially with superannuation. Christopher Zinn says we need to understand how to make informed choices when incumbent businesses operate in a "confuscopoly". 

It is a big ‘what if’ because too many businesses profit from the lack of determination of their customers for better products, services and even prices.The public’s desire for improvement is dulled by a widespread disengagement, resignation and inertia that anything they do may actually be much better for them.

And the consumer malaise seems worse in those markets which really count most because of the sums involved: superannuation, health and other insurances, energy such as electricity and telecommunications.

The symptoms are a lack of switching to better offers, which tends to benefit the incumbent above the challenger brand, and even paying over the odds by sticking with the wrong plan and perhaps the wrong provider.

The figures are sobering. The Australian Communications and Media Authority says poor plan choice around telecoms has cost consumers a probably under-estimated $1.5 billion a year.

Superannuation is confusing for customers

The ATO holds more than $18 billion in lost superannuation accounts. And despite more than 11 million Australians are covered by private health insurance less than 40,000 of them switch each year.

The fault is not solely the consumers. The ‘confusopoly’ of the mobile phone market in particular makes meaningful comparisons more than challenging.

Our cognitive biases, which make us particularly vulnerable to decisions around money and cause us to favour the present as opposed to the future, do not serve us well when it comes to assessing strategies around retirement savings.

And the complex and changing rules around health cover and premium rebates tend to drive policy-holders to sit pretty instead of seeking better value.

Of course some consumers are determined and realise a little time and effort in acquiring knowledge of these markets can save significant pain and expense.

But there’s a limit to even their patience and how much effort is worth it for how little a reward. There’s also the issue of expertise and the imbalance of information: as consumers we are amateurs buying from professionals.

We may only purchase a new car every few years, but the sales staff sell them every day, and however canny you are they will always know more about the vehicle, its true value and how to upsell you on various unnecessary warranties.

One way to correct this asymmetry, as it’s sometimes called, is to gather like-minded consumers together and use their numbers as leverage in negotiating better terms.

It’s already happening in specific markets such as energy and insurance as One Big Switch, with whom I used to be director of campaigns, has demonstrated here and overseas.

Another way is selectively reforming markets by regulation. In Australia conflicts of interest with financial planners led to the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) legislation.

The government is seeking to severely dilute these much needed consumer protections, claiming they are somehow excess ‘red-tape’. In fact they represent a much-needed shark-proof cage for consumers to more safely navigate financial waters.

In the US and UK regulation is helping liberate consumers’ usage data from the back offices of utilities and banks so citizens can employ trusted third parties to crunch the numbers and help them make better decisions.

The determined consumer can take back control

Being determined as a consumer is not just a state of mind, although that helps. In the future it will require the technologies which can bring us together quickly and cheaply to use some people power in markets.

It will also require more consumers to get hold of their own data and then find emerging intermediaries to help them make real sense of the complexity and choice fatigue which bedevils too many markets.

Determined consumers do not need to be told to shop around or read the fine print. They already know that, but they do need help in turning their determination into better decisions.

Christopher Zinn is an independent consumer advocate currently running a campaign to highlight the financial advice protections (www.saveourfofa.com.au). His other initiative is www.determinedconsumer.com.au which is aimed at motivating consumer action. UNO worked with Chris on consumer empowering programmes at CHOICE. He also co-founded One Big Switch as well as being a repoorter/producer at the ABC, Channel Nine and several newspapers.

The supermarket categories where marketing instore sways consumers' choice

Over 70% of FMCG categories are predetermined before shoppers enter the store. Most of the items bought in supermarkets are already determined by routine before the shopper walks down the aisle. Yet there's a massive opportunity for 28% of the product purchases where impulse purchasing still reigns. The question is, what categories do shoppers engage with instore?

The Nielsen Category Shopping Fundamentals survey shows more people go to the supermarket to buy milk (57%) than any other item. Now you know why Coles launched its massive $1 a litre own brand milk campaign to grab share from Woolworths. Yet milk is one of the least considered decisions shoppers make at point of sale. Over 70% of shoppers aren't engaged by the category in the store.

It's a similar story for pet food and toilet paper. If you're a marketer of these low engagement instore categories you will get a better marketing ROI from a brand advertising campaign or an incentive before people go shopping.

Low engagement products don't benefit well from instore merchandising

Prospects who are less interested in your product instore are best marketed to out of store. From flyers to shopper dockets, catalogues to mobile promotions driving people to the store you will have better impact than attempting to get their attention while on autopilot in your category aisle. Packaging and instore merchadising is also less likely to switch customers between brands than other categories where people are actually paying attention.

However over half the shoppers surveyed are engaged by the process of shopping, just not with every category. So it follows knowing which category a product falls into helps marketers decide where to best invest in marketing.

The high engagement FMCG categories are frozen snacks and desserts

Shoppers are more engaged by more indulgent purchases like frozen desserts (64%) and infrequent purchases like toothbrushes (64%). Here is a snapshot of what shoppers are looking at with their brains switched off versus on:

Categories with high engagement are better served by product innovation, instore merchandising and promotions and eye catching packaging.

Our marketing for Pacific West frozen seafood and snacks was centred on creating news and a fresh take on seafood. More adventurous choices has proven to be a more appealing strategy to the predictable product and positioning of Birdseye and I&J. Seven years of year on year growth for Pacific West shows what a difference it makes when you leverage an engaged instore audience.

Pugs & Kisses & Christmas Wishes

(Click to Play)

A sincere thanks to our friends and colleagues for sharing our journey in 2013, UNO’s 13^th year growing challenger brands.

We wish you and your family (and all creatures great and small) all the best for 2014.

Once again rather than send cards, we are supporting four koalas through the caring efforts of The Koala Foundation.

Best wishes from the UNO family.

AIDS ads that changed our lives: If it's not on, it's not on

Australia faced a big problem in the 80s: AIDS was killing us

In the late 1980s AIDS was spreading unchecked in Australia amongst sexually active adults with multiple partners, homosexual males and intravenous drug users. Most people had no idea how you could catch it and there was no known cure. The only certainty was if you found you had AIDS, it was a death sentence.

The first government advertising campaign to raise awareness of the issue had failed to address the spread of AIDS. While “The Grim Reaper” ads certainly gained attention, the messages had not connected with those at risk and had not changed unsafe sex practices.

Indeed the Grim Reaper had simply scared the general public, especially kids and older people, without offering a compelling safe sex message. In charge of the government's AIDS awareness task force, Ita Buttrose had acknowledged the mistake the Grim Reaper fear campaign had been. The agency responsible that she'd appointed was fired and we were asked to implement our campaign they'd originally passed over for the Reaper.

The creative solution: "next time you go to bed with someone, ask yourself..."

"...how many people are you really going to bed with?"

You can't scare people into doing what's good for them. In fact, it's human nature to reject being told what to do. The art of persuasion often begins with starting a conversation that acknowledges the audience's point of view. And builds from there with an undeniable logic.

This commercial for the first time educated the community it wasn't "other people" who got AIDS, it was potentially anyone who went to bed with someone for unprotected sex.

Shot by Ray Lawrence (who went on to direct Bliss, Lantana and Jindabyne) my AIDS "beds" ad was made before the era of computer generated images. We put 800 real people into 400 real beds in the largest space we could hire in Sydney, the old tobacco bond store in Moore Park. The campaign worked in achieving the brief of raising awareness and driving behaviour change amongst those most at risk. The managers at Ansell would report an uplift in condom sales with every burst of our ads.

It's not often in this business you get the opportunity to really make a difference for society. It's usually baked beans and banking products.

Over three years as lead creative communicator I helped develop a series of undeniable messages that were created for specific audiences. From mass market messages on TV and radio, brochures for distribution in health clinics, English as a second language ads in ethnic press to bus sides and gay street press, posters on beats and stickers on public toilet doors.

The “Beds” ad which asked “next time you go to bed with someone, ask yourself how many are you really having sex with?” gave a graphic explanation of the chain of infection. The “Tell him if it’s not on, it’s not on” ads empowered people to demand their partners wear a condom. On the back of dunny doors in pubs across the country you couldn't ignore the big sticker of a condom clad erect penis with the words: "cover yourself against AIDS"

The outcome: Australia led the world in stopping the spread of AIDS

The integrated advertising campaign successfully raised awareness of AIDS amongst those segments of society most at risk of infection. The messages also reassured those not at risk and transformed the public view from one of “victims of AIDS” to an empowering safe sex message.

The creative campaign was instrumental in educating the public and changing sexual behaviour to succesfully reduce the transmission of the AIDS virus. The leader of Australia's health sector tasked with stemming the epidemic acknowledged the strength of the campaign:

“The message in this war against AIDS is a tough one – we know it will be controversial but we are certain it is the right approach, and it is backed by the World Health Organisation.”

Professor Ron Penny, National AIDS Council, 1988

This AIDS campaign is still recognised around the world as the most effective of it’s kind

Obstacles to innovation: A jeweller’s tale

Have you read the retail sector is finally looking up? Unfortunately not for everyone.

A friend of mine is one of Australia’s leading luxury jewellers. This year his turnover is down 20% and the word in the trade is over two dozen high-end jewellers around Sydney are on the brink of closure. That’s a lot in such a niche category. What has served them well for decades has seemingly evaporated overnight.

Where have the sales gone? A few years ago no-one had heard of Pandora as a brand of jewellery. Australia is now Pandora's fouth biggest market in the world. Or have you heard of The Iconic as a place to shop for fashion? Last week The Iconic turned over $1,000,000 of online sales in one day.

The simple answer for retail is to go online, right?

My jeweller’s quandary is he opened an online store with a similar offer to his shop and failed to gain any incremental growth.

Global changes demand an innovative response

It’s not just small high-end jewellers suffering from change. The global super premium brands are suffering the curse of ubiquity, Louis Vuitton sales are plummeting despite the increase in purchases of luxury goods by the emerging Chinese millionaire class.

We are increasingly seeing fashion conscious style setters seeking designs from unknown startups, boutique designers that they can tell friends they’ve discovered. Being in the know has more credibility with peers than wearing what any person with a Platinum card can buy in any Gucci store, from Guangzou to Fifth Avenue, Sydney to Roppongi.

Big brands have difficulty innovating as they have an aversion to cannibalising their existing business. It becomes harder the bigger and more established you are, which fortunately gives Australian challenger brands an advantage. The barriers to innovation have been identified in a Australia wide research by the Australian Institute of Management:

What’s stopping Australian businesses innovating

My friend said he had come across an offshore maker of silver jewellery, gold plated with semi-precious stones that look amazing but only retail for $300 to $500. His fear is if he stocked them no-one would continue to pay $3,000 to $5,000 for his similar looking existing product.

My suggestion to my jeweller friend is to take advantage of his ability to be more nimble than a Tiffany. He isn't facing the number one barrier to innovation, a lengthy development time and there is a way he can try something new with minimal risk. If he quickly sets up a small online store under a different brand, he then has no reputation to lose and can test the appetite for this new product.

The ability to test the mix of product and price is easily done with an online store. I’ve written in the past about how we can learn from fashion retailers that are innovating for pricing advantage.

The study shows the upside to trying new ways by becoming an innovator in your category is huge.

Innovation leaders Vs laggers: business performance ratings.

Innovation leaders are two to three times more successful than innovation laggers in terms of growth, profitability, productivity and cash flow. Risk obviously has greater rewards than business as usual. One UNO case study proves the point, Butterfly Silver was the first Australian Jeweller to apply a fashion forward procurement model to become a successful challenger brand.

Source: University of Melbourne and the Australian Institute of Management. 2013

Sales conversion rates: the facts

Sales call stats – how does your team rate?

48% of sales people NEVER follow up with a prospect.

25% of sales people make a second contact and stop.

12% of sales people only make three contacts and stop.

Only 10% of sales people make more than three contacts with a prospect

So if your sales people are typical of all sales forces, what are the consequences of only 10% of them calling on a prospect more than three times?

Conversion rates increase with sales call rates

2% of sales are made on the first contact.

3% of sales are made on the second contact.

5% of sales are made on the third contact.

10% of sales are made on the fourth contact.

80% of sales are made on the fifth to twelfth contact

Sure, it costs more for your people to call more than 3 times, but consider your return on investment when you factor in the typical conversion rates. Three calls and under only converts 10% of sales!

If your sales people are not following up, the stats indicate there is little to be gained by simply adding new names for them to visit. It also shows the value of building brand awareness before the sales person calls.

Source: Richter10. Thanks to Rick Allen for sharing

Why are most ads so bad nowadays?

Bartle Bogle Hegarty was the London ad agency every ambitious Australian creative wanted to work at in the 80s. They made a series of great ads for Levis including “laundrette”, came up with "Vorsprung durch Technik" for Audi, "The Lynx Effect" for Unilever and "Keep Walking" for Johnnie Walker whiskey.

BBH creative founder “Sir” John Heggarty will speak at a global advertiser conference in Sydney in March. He has already given an idea of what advice he has to for Australia's advertisers.

What is the state of advertising creativity today?

“It’s one of the best times ever to be in advertising but why is it the work is poor,” he told AdNews from his organic and biodynamic vineyard in France. “I don’t know of any other industry in the world that would say the way to succeed is to make a worse product. And we seem to be in that situation in advertising."

CEOs in Australia say they want creativity 

More than anything else, a recent Australia wide survey of CEOs shows they want their marketing agencies to be creative. Yet one look around shows how poor ads are today.

The CEO of a financial services group asked me recently what killed the Australian ad industry? "The Internet?" he asked. "Globalisation" I answered.

The fact is, in Australia the biggest brands mostly run ads from somewhere else. They don’t care if their ads don’t work very well here, in the global scheme of things one year’s revenue in Australia can be surpassed in one long-weekend in Florida.

So I wasn’t surprised to see Sir John identify the cause of mediocre advertising. “You can talk about technology being the reason but for me the biggest issue is the globalisation of our industry. We don’t seem to be able to create work globally that has impact. I think marketers today are losing contact with people despite the fact they have many more ways of communicating with them.”

Meanwhile home grown ad standards are going down, down

We are increasingly bomdarded with ads produced in-house by Australia's retailers, further driving standards down, down. Over 30 years creating ads has taught me great creativity sells. Especially when developed by local writers and art directors who are in touch with the essence of what makes Australians tick. I believe clients are best served by ads that tap into human insights, no matter how small. When told with humour or compelling gravitas a human truth will cut through where so called big ideas with big budgets and big name stars fail to connect with real customers.

Are you more inclined to buy from someone you like? I know I respond better to brands that have an endearing conversation with me, rather than a list of claims shouted at me, even when put to a jingle. The answer to appealing to customers doesn't lie in more data.

Sir John also warned about the dangers of data and analytics –

“Clients are desperate for salesmanship to be a science. They would love it to be. They would love to be able to say this equals that and this will be the return on investment so let’s do it. But they can’t. In the end it’s a judgment call you still have to make.”

Lets all hope more advertisers re-embrace the power of creative story telling, it makes better viewing.

Customer loyalty in Australia comes at a different price to O.S.

Our region ranks 1st in responsiveness to loyalty programs

We now have proof customers in the Asia-Pacific are the most willing in the world to reward businesses with loyalty. Whether you are in a service or product category, the good news for Australian business managers is your customers' loyalty doesn’t have to come at the price of discounting.

Don’t think global when marketing local

You can out-maneuver big brands that continue applying globally what works in their home market. Consider implementing strategies that Australian customers will reward with loyalty.

The US is introspective, remember it's the country that has a World Series with only US teams. Most US companies don’t have our local market's needs on their radar. Meanwhile, Europe’s big brands are struggling at home with a deflationary market. These parochial management mindsets offer Australian brands an unique opportunity. It's the perfect time to think and act local where big global players have a tendency to universally apply one strategy.

A global survey now shows us just how different Australian consumers are compared to the home town customers of global brands.

The Neilsen Global Report of Loyalty shows our customers are different

Unlike Europe and the US where 82% customers want discounts and free products as a reward, in our region we are less motivated (70%) than anywhere else by something for nothing. Here customers lead the world in valuing good customer service (53%) and exclusive deals (41%). The Customer Loyalty Report shows your customers want you to give them quality and service more than just price:

Loyalty programs can improve profits

UNO applied the disciplines of building a loyalty program around quality and service for Vivien's Jewellers. We replaced monthly cardboard in-window price promotions with quality themed creative store merchandising. We introduced a VIP loyalty program that emphasised exclusive product offers. Sales, discounting and price promotions were no longer frequent, being replaced with special occassion sales through invitation-only Wednesday night store openings. While Angus & Coote and Michael Hill were seen to be always on sale, we built a reputation for accessable aspiration.

Over 5 years we transformed Vivien's sales base from only 25% repeat sales to 75%. This also helped Vivien's double the number of profitable stores and ultimately sell the business at a category premium.

I continue to encourage our challenger brand clients to compete with the global competition by developing marketing strategies focused on what customers really value. The big guys often lack the ability to get close to the customer, let alone respond. You may have noticed over the last year a number of visiting global FMCG heads lamenting how hard it is for them to make money in the Australian market. Coles and Woolies forcing them to cut margins isn't helping.

Do you cut for share or innovate to grow?

Increasingly businesses nimble enough to canibalise their existing sales by trialing new products or services will gain market share in the long term. And because they aren’t discounting, those sales can be more profitable.

Spend your time looking at ways to make your customers feel understood and then invest in a creative communucation of your differentiated proposition. Let the global brands discount their way to local irrelevance.

From the people who gave us wooden pillows – brand differentiation

Do you think it’s hard to differentiate in your category?

A trip to Japan gave me a fresh perspective on how to make any brand stand apart from the competition.

Last month I bought a new mattress from David Jones Sydney city store. Each brand had the same proposition: sleep soundly and wake refreshed. Choose between hard or soft, affordable or expensive.

Talk about a lack of fresh ideas, the promise of a good nights sleep hasn’t changed since I worked on the Simons mattress account 30 years ago, or the idea of looking after your back when I marketed Sealy “Posturepedic” 20 years ago.

The Japanese have a strange way of looking at brand propositions

At least on first view this first world nation has some peculiar ideas about brand messaging. The English language isn’t used by 999 out of 1,000. And Japan has a proud history of maintaining thousand year old traditions. So this different background means common products are often promoted in totally different ways to our western approach.

A couple of weeks ago I checked out the merchandising of mattresses in a central Tokyo department store. Here are some pictures I took when the salesman wasn’t looking – mattresses marketed the way Nike sells shoes.

Nothing soft and fluffy about this positioning – “Activor, the next generation in sleep technology.” Hi-tech performance for the modern Japanese consumer. 

Feeling inspired? Whatever your category, you can find inspiration from taking a completely different perspective.

P.S. Aussie mattress brand repositions for export market

Local mattress maker A H Beard has just launched in China. Unencumbered by any legacy in this new market, how are they differentiating? Their first mattress for Chinese consumers retails for over $20,000. That should set them apart.

Vale Scott Kennedy – one of NZ's finest artists

Our professional careers are sometimes touched by the most inspiring personal relationships. I was blessed with the early entry into my life as an Art Director by an artistic genius from across the ditch, Scott Kennedy. It was the early 80s and any Kiwi artist of promise had washed up in Sydney seeking a broader canvas.

Scott bid us goodbye last week after a painful but defiantly good-humoured fight with cancer. At the end his hands wouldn’t work, but Scott’s creativity was always alive in his one of a kind headspace.

As you can see Scott’s view of life was re-expressed through the lens of 60s cartoon characters and tin toy robots and Dr Strangelove. His ex-US Army dad had relocated the entire family from California to New Zealand in the belief it was the safest place to be when they dropped The Bomb.

I loved Scott for his quirky humour, big heartedness and child like enthusiasm for new creative possibilities. Have a Captain Cook at Scott’s book covers for the popular How to… series, no surprises which is my favourite.

I write this while wearing Scott's "Joy kills sorrow" T-shirt, which is a fitting memorial to his precious time with us.

What CEOs want from an agency

The top 3 things CEOs and CMOs want from their agency according to a survey by the Communications Council are:

1. Innovation and creativity

2. Leadership

3. Integrity

Funnily enough, the leaders of agencies put Leadership last.

Which could explain why three quarters of CEOs don't value marketers at the board level.

I wonder if this is a reflection of the transaction based relationships most agencies seem to be stuck in today. Whatever happened to “fearless advice”. It's what most left brain business managers want from right brain agency creative thinkers. Creative thought leadership is where agencies add value, not servile account management.

Perhaps it’s a consequence of a co-dependent relationship between ignorant brand managers and subservient suppliers. Meanwhile the smart business leaders appreciate the real value to be added is at the board level, with lateral and entrepreneurial advisors from outside their organisation helping them challenge traditional business models.