Why use social media when your business has a website? The stats say it all

One of my clients attended a Social Media Marketing forum at Deakin University recently. He was surprised just how out of touch most marketing and business managers are with this medium as a means for promoting a business. The questions being asked were about how to control staff access to social media or how to post their brands’ advertising and collateral across the newer platforms.

This top down approach where management dictates the agenda no longer cuts it.

In the same way the Internet has empowered the public to access their news, music and entertainment whenever they want, not when the distributers choose to roll it out, Social Media is taking the online quest for information about products and services away from publishing and brand sites. Social Media is creating a vibrant forum for conversation about products, services and brands beyond the direct control of a company’s sales and marketing force.

The statistics show the rapid pace of change of where people are going online in search of information of all kinds.

Trend away from website visitation to Social Web

Google trends show over the last 2 years a significant decline in visitors to brand and media sites.

Boom in Social Media and content sharing

More people are seeking and sharing what they want online.               

It’s no longer enough to have a brochure style website, you can no longer sit back while your salesforce distributes your marketing collateral and your marketing department runs ads telling the masses how good you are.

Everyone in your organisation and every one of your customers is now a prospective advocate for your business. Or they might be saying your competitors are better. You can’t control the conversation, but to compete today you need to formulate a social media strategy, coach your staff, create content of use to customers and prospects and contribute to the conversation in an open and honest way.               

Small can succeed in retail against big budget incumbents

Growing up in sixties suburban Sydney the most exotic cuisine my family was familiar with was cabanossi on Jatz crackers. Father felt like a Tooheys or two and good on my mum, she knew Tip Top was the one. Fortunately, forty years of immigrant mothers from around the globe have helped expand Australians’ culinary horizons.

Family businesses show how to be a challenger brand

At the Food and Wine Expo held by Family Business Australia in Sydney in November, the influence of Nonnas was evident as third generation business owners showcased their gourmet products. Their time has come, statistics show the trend to gourmetisation of the Australian shopping basket has now reached beyond the specialist deli and ethnic store to the Supermarket.

Unlike most trade shows, what struck me at the FBA event was the friendly atmosphere, no hard sell, just an infectious enthusiasm for the products these families have been creating for years and a desire to share business stories. From the small catering company making their first tentative step into retail, through to a food service business that gave up on retail in the 70s, one story is common: the bigger challenge isn’t getting onto the shelves of Coles and Woolworths, it’s how to stay there and make a profit.

Two family businesses, Taylors Wines and Coopers Brewery, are testament to the magic ingredient for success in the retail market – the power of building a brand. Branding is what puts the power in your hands, not the channel’s. Building a brand takes more than one-off promotions, or advertising that simply says you are in store now, or paying for inclusion in catalogues with discount offers. To build a brand you need to invest in marketing over time to establish the brand story and your values.

Brand marketing delivers these benefits over a me-to sales approach: 

Product

Easy to copy
A commodity
No special distinguishing features
What a factory produces
Shorter life cycle
Addresses functional needs
No identity
Products compete on price 

Brand

Hard to copy 
What consumers buy 
Emotional fit with consumers
Level of confidence and trust 
Longer life cycle 
Addresses emotional needs 
Have personalities 

Brand can demand a premium

Fosters Group has destroyed shareholder value to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars over the last decade by mismanaging the marketing of some icon wine brands, from Lindemans and Penfolds to Seppelt and Tollana. Meanwhile, family business Taylors Wines has stayed true to its five decade history with consistent product, packaging and promotion.

Nick Levy, the marketing manager at Taylors, wouldn’t dream of throwing out the heritage of this family business, whereas corporations time and again allow each new brand manager to make their mark by changing the label their customers know and love to chase a fleeting fashion. Often the new look comes at the expense of long won recognition. Similarly, downgrading a product’s quality to maintain margin or constantly price-cutting to gain share ultimately destroys brands.

Yes, we live in a time where the pace of change is so much faster, yet taking the time to establish what you stand for, developing a dialogue with your customers and creating a sense of authenticity are increasingly valuable tools in a world where global producers can pitch to your retailer with a cheaper knock off product as soon as you leave the buyer’s office.

If you value what you have to sell, it pays to remind your customers as often as you can of why they should love you. Now you can afford to. New technologies, data intelligence and eCommunications now enable challenger brands to compete successfully with the large advertising budgets of corporations.

So find the true benefit of your offer and actively market it. As Revlon said, having built an empire with brand marketing, “we don’t sell cosmetics, we sell hope.” Worked on my mum.  

This article first appeared in Business Insight

Leave traditional marketing to your competition... Now there are smarter ways to connect

To make the most of a marketing budget there are now smarter ways to integrate social media and search optimisation.

Many struggle to keep abreast of the changing landscape, while companies that take advantage of 'eCommunication' will benefit from increased efficiencies, decreased costs and improved customer engagement.

Traditional marketing funnel view of prospects...

Medium and message is aligned to where the audience is in the funnel, information is controlled by the brand.

The decision making process in an e-connected era...

Time to replace the old touchpoints with a new mix

The journey is no longer simply linear, the customer now has control over what they see and read on any subject. The audience enters, leaves and re-enters the decision making process more often, with more access to information from more sources when they want it. 

Your eCommunications checklist

Whether your business is B2B or B2C, it’s no longer enough to think in the linear way of out of home, in store (channel), at home. Here is a new set of options which UNO utilise to supersede or integrate with existing programs:

Are you a retailer or publisher, advertiser or educator? The Internet has blurred the lines.

There used to be clear delineations between product manufacturer/creator, channel/distributor, retailer and end consumer.

Enabling this traditional marketing model there was mass media. Advertising mad men then helped consumers to embrace the products and services they hadn’t heard of and didn’t know they needed. Now the interconnections of the Internet have transformed the sequence of commerce and marketing.

Customers are now researching every category online

People have a need? They research online for themselves in the safety of their own home, avoiding the charms of advertisers and brand collateral, packaging and point of sale merchandising. The empowered consumer accessing product knowledge on the web via forums, chatrooms and reviews is beyond the charms of the seasoned salesman on the shop floor.

Even more disconcerting for the traditional retailer of a product or service is the emergence of the medium no longer just being the message, but now a vertically integrated marketing model.

From books to money management, every category has been turned inside out and upside down. What was linear, is now a 3D demand and supply freeform organism.

Consider books. A hard back would come out, early adopters would pay a hefty premium, soft cover would follow, trends would be noted, popular titles would have second and third editions printed and distributed, blockbusters would be advertised and the retailers would rake in the cash and the publishers would cover the costs of the many failures by most of their authors.

Then Amazon cut out the middleman, and now with the Kindle is changing the distance from content to delivery even further, you can now download and store a library of 3500 “books” on a device that is close to the price of a couple of hardbacks. So if there is no need to print and distribute, does the author deal direct with Amazon, seeing the retailer become the publisher?

Even services aren’t untouched by the digital revolution

Take for example Superannuation Funds. If you work you have one, no wonder there are thousands of funds competing for a share of 9% of your salary.

For Australian investors there used to be 3 Clayton’s choices, the choice you have when you don’t get a choice. If you were a blue-collar worker your employer put you into the Industry Super Fund that was created for your industry. If you were a public servant, you were automatically in your government fund. White-collar workers had a modicum of choice, the local Insurance salesman would flog a retail fund and benefit from the handsome commission and trailing fees.

Not any more. Super Choice means most can now choose their fund. Those who are motivated research online, in fact 50.6% do, whereas only 12% turn to newspapers and a mere 3% magazines. So while all those funds are spending hundreds of millions advertising in mass media, savvy investors that are shopping around are stumbling upon a vertically integrated model. Fairfax Digital owns InvestSmart, a licensed financial services business that bought Direct Access, which was a discount retailer of funds. Fairfax in its wealth and business sections publishes articles on super and investment. On the same pages are links and comparison tools branded InvestSmart. These tools and tips and comparison lists educate the Super Shopper. Then when they are ready to buy, fulfillment is just one click away for a fee a fraction of the traditional adviser model. So the publisher becomes the retailer.

So does all of this mean consumers are better off? The fastest growing and the biggest segment by value of the 1.4 trillion dollar Super category is DIY. Self Managed Super offers investors the allure of control. Pity the average SMSF underperforms the average Industry Fund and has higher costs, until someone challenges the model that is.

Whether you are a retailer or a service provider, a financial services business or a manufacturer, it’s now time to reappraise your marketing model before your competition beats you to it.

Time for Australian retailers to sell online or be left behind

Marketers have spent the last decade watching Woolworths maintain dominance in grocery while Coles failed to focus on customer needs and treated suppliers with disdain. Under Wesfarmers things are starting to change, yet the biggest fight in retail over the next decade is more likely to be driven by a huge shift to buying online.

While Australia’s Westfield has over 30 years fine-tuned a profitable model to encourage a visit to the Mall, as therapy for the modern empty soul, the Internet is on the cusp of changing the behaviour of society in an equally profound way.

It’s already happening. In 2009 Australians spent $24billion on retail online according to research commissioned by eBay and predicts a 40 percent increase to $32.8billion in 2012.

Australia’s retailers are falling behind the rest of the world in grabbing a share of the online retail spend. "As Australian retailers struggle to build effective online presence, overseas competitors are taking advantage of the gap in the Australian market and are currently taking around 40 per cent of Australia's online retail spend," according to PayPal MD Paul Feller.

"There is a huge opportunity for retailers to capitalise on the growing online marketplace in Australia. In the last six months alone the average consumer spent $1,223 on online shopping, an increase of $130 from the second half of 2009."

So Westfield has to balance an online strategy with keeping footfall high in the malls to keep those retail tenants in biz. No easy task, now that broadband speeds and speed and reliability of delivery through the mail are narrowing the gap between online purchase and the wardrobe.

Who shops online?

My daughter buys most of her clothes online from the US and UK for a fraction of local prices, my son buys his music and sound gear from all corners of the world and Amazon keeps my partner well read. Online purchases of all sorts of items will become the norm, especially as the ways to enhance the shopping experience online grow.

In the past you would see the latest fashions in a magazine spread, be exposed to an ad on TV with Megan Gale for David Jones and go the mall to try it on. Now the whole experience can be completed online. The Ceros platform is being used by the likes of Sears, Tesco, Virgin and IKEA to show product and close a sale using a rich media eMagazine. Have a look. We’re already using it to help our challenger brand clients leave their competition behind.

Marketing tips for fund managers

Fund managers can make more money by marketing. The trick is to know what marketing is exactly...

I have a passion for following fund managers’ performance and comparing how they stack up against their investment philosophies. There are a handful of fund managers who stick by their principles and deliver above average results through the ups and downs of the markets. What surprises many managers is that investment doesn’t always come flooding their way when they are doing better than the index. There are plenty of examples where poor performing funds continue to dominate in the competition for FUM.

It’s not enough to rely on BDMs and the distribution and sales channels; every fund is out there building relationships with the instos and advisers. The commercial reality is rooted in human nature; ultimately the salesmen who managers are relying on to recommend a fund will go for the easy sell. And as we’ve seen, performance can’t be the only draw card or there wouldn’t be 19,500 funds on the market where the biggest generally aren’t the best. It would be a mistake to think the end of commissions will result in a rush to quality, inertia and confusion will see to that.

It’s time the better managers tried something new to most in the industry. It’s what’s been honed and crafted by the world’s most successful companies, from Apple to Armani, Mercedes to Mars: it’s marketing. In a world of multiple choices, marketing is one of the few tools that can make a significant contribution to the success of a business.

The financial services industry still confuses sales and distribution for marketing

It isn’t. Marketing takes the ball the first fifty metres and sales kick the goal. Then it’s marketing that continues to remind investors why they made the right decision choosing your fund, so they’ll stick by you through the inevitable bumps and falls. And invest with you again and again.

In the words of Wikipedia, marketing is the process by which companies determine what products or services may be of interest to customers, and the strategy to use in sales, communications and business development. It is an integrated process through which companies create value for customers and build strong customer relationships in order to capture value from customers in return.

Manage the image you create for your brand and how you promote it

From product design and the language you use, your logo and stationery, the look and imagery in brochures and PDSs, the content and design of e-newsletters, what is on your website and how it is presented, to advertising and sales collateral. When every part is working together in a co-ordinated fashion the whole adds far more value to the business than the investment in the parts. And just like investments, managed well marketing delivers compound returns.

Over the years I’ve found integrated marketing works just as well for financial institutions as it does for baked beans. Research by the School of Management and Finance, University of Nottingham showed back in 1998 the similarities emerging even then between consumers’ responses to financial services ads which featured the same cues as ads for fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) and the influence on subsequent purchase decisions.

Put simply, when it comes to proven ways to make money, fund managers can get a healthy ROI from marketing. For evidence, they just have to ask about the results of my many marketing experiences of 30 years, from banks to baked beans.

Signs of the times... who has the time?

Outdoor advertising is diminishing in effectiveness, like many traditional mediums

Not surprising when you think about the increasing clutter advertising billboards have to compete with for attention.

In the Drive section of the SMH the other day one motoring journo observed: “I went to a suburban shopping district and counted 19 road signs clustered around the first intersection. There were 55 road information messages in about 100 metres. Even when travelling at 40km/h you are left with just nine seconds to read them". In the book Traffic, Tom Vanderbilt states the average driver must process 1340 pieces of information every minute.

So recently when a client asked UNO to review their annual advertising media budget we weren’t too keen to recommend continuing to spend several hundred thousand dollars for one poster above the M4.

Old habits die-hard, the CEO drives to work each day and passes that one sign. We couldn’t convince management that for about 20% of the cost of that one sign they could develop an ongoing relationship with their customers using the latest Web2.0 technologies and build a valuable database for future use.

While traditional media companies like Eye Corp continue to sell posters, a medium that hasn’t changed for a couple of centuries, newer more effective alternatives are emerging. (When the price is right.) ROI marketing starts with understanding the real stats.

Innovation in signage

Recently Ryan Simpson of Val Morgan showed me the latest research on their innovative take on signage, large video screens in shopping centres.

While I always take statistics with a grain of salt, the figures reflect the relationship between clutter and proximity to where the purchase can be made. Despite the amount of billboards, busbacks and taxibacks that shoppers must have passed on their way to the shops, almost 50% say they didn’t notice any advertising. 30% remembered noticing billboards, whereas this new moving screen medium within shopping centres was noticed by over 70% of the 1,000 people surveyed by Nielsen research.

Pity I didn’t have those sorts of stats on hand when I tried to talk that client out of spending a large chunk of their budget on that one sign.               

Bigger ad budgets usually mean greater waste

Marketers don't always get what they pay for. I recently met with the new regional head of one to one marketing of a world leading brand. One to one is their fancy term for online. This new manager has been brought in from the USA to determine how the millions of dollars they spend annually in this region can deliver a better return.

Mid size companies can learn from the mistakes of larger marketers with larger budgets. Some of the areas of waste this expert has identified in just a few months are listed here:

Marketing budgets managed within silos is inefficient

Some products have budgets too small to make any impact, while others spend more than necessary because they have a larger allocation. Simply by adding an overview of expenditure across the portfolio would deliver a win win result.

Too many contracts with too many large agencies can drive a big spending approach. Marketing managers with little experience are often given average strategic advice and average creative executions. Large agencies are inclined to overspend on media exposure, (with commissions it's an easy earn).

Set marketing KPIs upfront

Smarter marketers know investing in more management time upfront determining objectives and KPIs, with strategic intellect and strong creative can mean a much smaller media spend can deliver greater impact, more leads and higher conversion rates. There is also an inevitable diminishing return factor from spending more, if someone sees your ad two or three times and still hasn't bought, spending more to show them the same proposition four or five times is simply a waste of money.

There is value in retained knowledge

Years of collected data, research results, campaign learnings and customer databases are often ignored with each new project. Every campaign can and should add incremental value to the next. Take a test and learn approach, rather than a big spending one-off hit. This is one of the fastest ways to implement ROI marketing.

Fortunately for my mid sized clients, I've found over the years insight led creative marketing can punch above it's media weight time and again.

GM a victim of launch and leave

For General Motors, big has not proven to be better. From 50% market share to 20% and bankruptcy in just 40 years has partly been blamed on an inability of management to move with the shift from big gas guzzlers to smaller cars. The disastrous purchase of Hummer in 1999 showed how recently GM thought big still had a big future. Time has proven there were only a few big spenders like Renee Rivkin who bought these massive buckets of bolts, obviously not enough to pay the massive borrowing costs.

Less obvious to the public, and of more interest to marketers, are the views being expressed that a lack of advertising support has played a very significant role in the rapid market share loss to the Japanese car makers.

One example was the surprisingly upbeat statements by the head of marketing of GM, he is excited by the prospect of having less brands to support with his marketing budget. With the jettisoning of divisions like Pontiac, he'll be left with just four brands to promote, including Chevrolette and Cadillac. This he trumpets will give him a chance to compete with the same ad budget as Toyota.

In an obituary of the once market leading General Motors, The New York Times blames management for a failure to support it's product with advertising.

Advertising works, The New York Times says so

It points out GM finance staff wrestled with product developers and marketers, thus causing GM to fall victim to a practice called launch and leave - that is, putting product on the market, then failing to support them with advertising.

As someone who has played a part in helping numerous businesses grow share by using smart, creative advertising, this is a particularly public example of the consequences of not believing in the power of marketing. If you ever have to justify to management the wisdom of investing in advertising, when so many accountants seem to view it as a discretionary cost, use this following quote from a past executive of GM who was part of the team that created the successful Pontiac GTO in the 60s and wrote the book about it Glory Days...

Image is everything in building brand equity

Nobody gave any respect to this thing called image, because it wasn't in the business plan. It was about "when is it going to earn a profit?"

As the New York Times points out, over the years the marketing skeptics at GM became practiced at the art of explaining their problems, attributing blame to everyone but themselves.

It pays to trust people with passion

In the last week a visit from a chimney sweep and a conversation with a successful Australian manufacturer reminded me of the value of passion in business.

I was surprised when the chimney sweep asked when was the last time my chimney had been cleaned. Annually didn’t make sense to him judging by what he saw with his fancy mirror... unless I burn 20 tonnes of wood a year, which I don’t. I was quickly impressed by his enthusiastic run down on the finer points of proper chimney maintenance. This man has been cleaning chimneys for 27 years and was still getting a buzz from helping people solve their dirty flue problems, he described the joy solving more difficult challenges and leaving customers with fires that draw like new. His fee was no more than the company that has under serviced us over the last few years.

Whatever service you need, find a practitioner who is passionate about what they do

One of my long standing clients, going on nine years now, makes plantation shutters. Marion Mikkelsen of Open Shutters is passionate about her product, and has built a brand over this time that has proven resilient against the onslaught of cheap Chinese imports. She is so passionate every aspect of her business is constantly reviewed with the objective of constant improvement. She refuses to compromise, so instead of cutting corners to save costs this business runs on a successful program of creative thinking, R&D, staff training and manufacturing innovation.

This passion shows in her product, which my wife thought was the best when she did her pre-purchase research for our home. It was only a few years later I coincidentally won Marion as a client... it is great to be able to market a product you’ve bought yourself.

Why do so many business people mistrust each other?  

Over 20 years this pioneer of timber shutters in Australia has led with product innovation and with UNO’s marketing help driven the growth of the category. Yet Marion lamented this week how it’s only after many years her distributors are beginning to trust what she says about her product and her overarching belief in the necessity to fulfill the expectations of consumers. How could so many small business owners not recognise the genuine passion displayed by Marion?

I shouldn’t be surprised, I often find business prospects are cynical of what I have to say about how smart marketing can help their businesses succeed. I’m passionate about what I can do to help people, however it’s even harder to be believed when I work in an industry that the public constantly ranks at the bottom of the trust table alongside used car sales and real estate agents.

Get social media right or "you're stuffed"

Every time you use something that you aren't being charged for, remind yourself, it's because you are the product. SMH.com.au, LinkedIn, Facebook, Pinterest all let you read and/or post for free because they are making money out of YOU. Businesses of all kinds are constantly gathering data from you and about you and your contacts most of the time you do something digitally. Facebook can now access your phone’s microphone to eavesdrop on what you are listening/watching while you post an update.

The upside is you will be served ads or content or search results that have been vetted just for you. The downside if you're marketing your own business online is you have to recognise the average person will increasingly expect to receive only what they care about.

Social marketing 101: What's in it for your customer?

As Jane Caro told a room full of online marketers recently, people are "entirely able to screen you out no matter how much money you put behind (your message.)

“If the message is not relevant, if the message doesn’t mean anything to them, you’re stuffed.

“the power has moved from those people with large pockets to the population at large. But you can have no money at all and send a Tweet that resonates and takes off like wildfire and suddenly you’re famous.”

Research by McKinseys has shown businesses have found the primary benefit of embracing social media is the ability to open a dialogue with customers and actually listen to what customers want. Not talk at them like a brochure, but understand what they care about and respond, or learn and move on. Here's a reminder of the simple etiquette of doing a business on the Itnerweb.

3 rules of social media engagement: the 3 Rs

To participate in social media as a representative of an organistion or company it is important to remember 3 rules.

Be clear about who you are representing, take personal responsibility for ensuring that any references to your company are factually correct and accurate and do not breach confidentiality requirements, and show respect for the individuals and communities with which you interact.

Remember, you are personally responsible for the content of the posts online. If employing a ghost writer, it is your responsibility to sign off on final content. Ensure any information about your products and services that you provide is true and factually accurate.

Respect copyright, privacy, financial disclosure and other applicable laws when publishing on social media platforms.

If you break the law you may also be personally liable.

There is no best way to compete

Remember that scene with Steve Martin ordering coffee L.A. style – "a half double decaf decaffeinated half caf... with a twist of lemon." (The video is at the end for you to enjoy.) It seems every single decision we now make throughout the day comes with an endless number of choices.

So it came as no surprise when a global a marketing guru presented research to the World Business Forum in Sydney that proves, in industry after industry, there is no single best way to compete.

How to differentiate your brand today

The worst mistake in strategy is to compete with rivals on the same dimensions, Professor Michael Porter says. The man who’s made strategy his life work says many businesses still get confused around the definition of the concept of differentiation, and that even trying to be ‘the best’ means a business is starting in the wrong place strategically.

Porter points out "we all know it’s impossible to meet every need of every customer uniquely well. That’s impossible. There’s no one way to deliver value.

“Strategy starts with a notion that the fundamental question is not how to be the best, it’s actually how to deliver something unique. To the customers you’re choosing to serve. Not because what you’re doing is ‘the best’ but because what you’re doing is delivering distinctive value.

Strategy is about being unique. That’s ultimately what all successful companies are able to achieve for some period of time."

The formula for growing challenger brands

If today we are spoiled for choice, it follows the prospective customers for our business are too. So instead of seeking some magic wand global answer, a better strategy is to identify one thing people you're trying to serve actually care about. Something that you're good at delivering. Finding your mojo is the fundamental starting point in our formula for growing challenger brands.

What happens when the CMO spends more on IT than the CIO

The head of marketing will soon be spending more on IT than the head of IT, so a recent study by Gartner found. Last week at the annual adfest in Cannes, Ogilvy's top creative warned of how too much faith was being put into data and not enough into ideas. This was resulting in well planned and placed ads that don't actually achieve much.

Where is the real value to be found in marketing?

The more things change the more they stay the same. The problem in the past was IT managers spent a fortune, first on hardware and then software to sytemise the running of the business. Whether or not the customers' experience was improved was not the concern of the CIO. You only had to dial 3 for support to know that. The main focus of the CIO was all about having bragging rights his IT budget was bigger than the competitors'.

Now we are seeing marketing managers playing the same game, "my Big Data budget is bigger than yours." Businesses are paying more and more to collect big brother levels of information on people. You've experienced the result like everyone else – being hit with ads on Facebook when all you want to do is see a picture of a friend's fishing trip. This may be how Zuckerberg will try to make an earn for shareholders, it isn't the road to marketing Nirvana. Just like the IT managers of the past, what the customer wants once again isn't the focus.

The constant here is managers within the business concentrating on the business of the business, rather than looking for ways to make a customer's life better. You probably recognise the trap, I fell for it. For several years I paid too much time and money on experienced professional staff and IT consultants to implement and manage programs to systemise my business. None of it added to the power of connecting and motivating, inspiring or creating. It was money spent on smooth bureaucracy for neatness sake and failed to grow my customers' businesses, nor consequently my own.

Rational Vs emotional marketing approach

"Investment" in IT has always been a rational spreadsheet sell to the chief decision maker. How often have you witnessed a marketing department asking for a "brand building" budget lose out to the CIO who could promise a guaranteed ROI from some new IT? Problem is marketers seem to be giving up the fight at the board level for using emotion to connect with customers, instead choosing the easy route of asking for funding for data. Spend X get Y. Yet economic modelling consistently shows the customer is innately irrational, human beings are pre-programmed that way. This is at the heart of getting the best marketing ROI.

Your customers are more emotional when making purchase decisions than rational

The influential role of emotion in consumer behavior is well documented, here is a summary by Antonio Damasio, professor of neuroscience at the University of Southern California –

• MRI neuro-imagery shows that when evaluating brands, consumers primarily use emotions (personal feelings and experiences) rather than information (brand attributes, features, and facts).
• Advertising research reveals that emotional response to an ad has far greater influence on a consumer’s reported intent to buy a product than does the ad’s content – by a factor of 3-to-1 for television commercials and 2-to-1 for print ads.
• Research conducted by the Advertising Research Foundation concluded that the emotion of “likeability” is the measure most predictive of whether an advertisement will increase a brand’s sales.
• Studies show that positive emotions toward a brand have far greater influence on consumer loyalty than trust and other judgments which are based on a brand’s attributes.

So it follows a business that concentrates on chasing efficiency by spending big on data risks failing to connect on the more powerful emotional level.

Challenger brands care most about what the customer thinks matters most

Challenger brands that actually care about what customers want are winning by using the Cloud to remove superfluous steps from the delivery of products and services, often without big IT budgets. One example I know intimately is an Australian first, UNOsmsf, Cloud based Self Managed Super.

The rational customer benefit: More choice, more control, lower fees. We'll be using an emotional truth to appeal to prospective clients: your fund can do better than your mates with more money who are paying through the nose for an average product the big banks want to sell them using big data.

Check out the superannuation challenger brand taking on the banks from the Cloud.

Top 5 biz management blunders

Have you read any of Robert Gottliebsen's recent articles on the impending 12 billion dollar plane crash coming our way? Australia's purchase of three squadrons of Joint Strike Fighters – 58 at over $100million each is a fine example of the 5 management blunders many businesses tend to make.

5 blunders for management to avoid (& tips on marketing)

Gottliebsen quoted Liberal senator Jensen, a scientist, explaining what a blunder the decision to purchase the JSF is proving to be. Here I paraphrase Robert, with my own warnings on the blunders to avoid when making decisions about marketing::

Rule 1 of management blunders

Ignore expert advice and go with your gut. A decade ago Australia's manager at the top, John Howard, ignored the advice of aviation experts and bought into the development of the JSF. In my experience, being told the CEO doesn't believe in marketing or paying for external advice is more common than finding a boss willing to admit where their expertise ends.

Rule 2 of management blunders

When you make a big decision, those who continue to oppose you need to be pushed aside -- everyone must get with the program. Creativity is stifled by group think, yet it's creative thinking that helps businesses compete on their own terms, rather than taking the category head on.

Rule 3 of management blunders

All staff involved in the decision are ‘looked after’. E.g. In the case of the JSF, Senator Jensen has studied carefully what happened and says "there are too many who get jobs with contractors where they have provided advice favouring that contractor's product.” Advertising is renowned for managers procuring from friends who are designers, family members who know photoshop and printers who give them tickets to the rugby.

Rule 4 of management blunders

Delay as long as possible in telling the people at the top that the decision is wrong. In corporations, big, sudden write-downs are often caused because management down the line keeps putting a good spin on the data to keep their jobs, until finally they have to confess. Or in my experience, they are found out long after they've moved on. One CEO didn't realise that for two years none of my proposals to fix their problems had ever been passed up to him by his marketing manager. It was only after firing the manager he discovered an email trail where my strategies and estimates had been constantly forwarded to her close friend, who was then being commissioned for services beyond their capability at far higher prices.

Rule number five

Obscure the costs with all sorts of creative accounting. In marketing and advertising, this is really easy when so many managers claim to know the cost of everything, when they actually don't understand the value of anything.

The common theme here is the tendency of management to throw staff at problems, at great long term cost, when trusting experts would be better for business.

Get onboard the online retail bandwagon: $14.9bn & racing

The idea that online retail is about discounts isn't in line with the facts. While margins might be tighter, e-commerce is no longer just about bargains and end-of-line clearances. The latest NAB Online Retail Sales Index shows just how broad Australian retailing has become. Daily Deals sites are stuck at 3% share. The biggest online sales growth stories now are in liquor and groceries.

Department stores and appliance retailers the big winners, or losers online?

The mainstreaming of e-commerce can be seen in the leadership of department store products with a whopping one third of online spending. Once slow to adopt, Myer now offers 119,000 individual products online.

Domestic operators still have the lion’s share of online sales at around 75%. Gerry Harvey’s call for a GST on foreign online sales is just noise when you consider he mostly sells homewares and appliances, the second largest online category. I don’t see Australia Post delivering washing machines bought from Best Buy New York via their online store as a threat to Gerry. The threat is internal, his stores are failing to add value to the sales process and Harvey Norman still doesn't appear to have a strategy to compete with local online challengers.

Challenger brands have an advantage online

If anything, e-commerce puts the power back into the hands of customers who want to deal direct with manufacturers. Australian challenger brands, when they make a product that locals actually want, can cut out the blood sucking Coles/Woollies duopoly and the Gerry Harvey’s.

When brands reinvest into marketing a portion of the retailer margins that going online cuts from the delivery chain, they can grow share long term. This way e-commerce becomes a WIN, WIN equation for brand and customer.

An example of this approach is the transformation of a traditional Australian designer manufacturer of compression and sportswear – Quick Response. UNO has helped them transform from a wholesaler at the mercy of retailers to a direct-to-consumer e-business. This challenger brand is now competing with SKINS, (the retail market leader with a high priced foreign made product), by offering superior Australian made garments direct online, at a better price. Check out the QRS compression online store.

The future for online retail marketing

While retail sales generally have been mostly flat, ABS figures show Australian’s spent 27% more online in the year to March than the year before.

The NAB online spend index doesn’t include online shopping paid for by Paypal, transfers or EFTPOS, so the 6.5% of all retail spending measured in the latest report to March 2014 is an underestimate of the reality. Marketers need to view online retail as a growing opportunity for current business growth, not just a nice to have in the future.

Source: National Australia Bank Online Retail Sales Index.

Truth in advertising?

Which professions are most trusted in 2014? Research shows the Australian public rate nurses 91% for ethics and honesty, once again at the top, whereas most professions don't rank well in the trust stakes at all.

No prizes for guessing who rates last at 3%, it's the same profession that has been at the bottom every year since Roy Morgan began their annual "Image of Professions" survey in 1986.

2014 rankings of professions for ethics and honesty 

1. Nurses
2. Pharmacists
3. Doctors
4. High Court Judges
5. Dentists
6. School teachers
7. Engineers
8. Police
9. Supreme Court Judges
10. University lecturers
11. Accountants
12. Bank managers
13. Lawyers
14. Ministers of religion
15. Public servants
16. Public opinion pollsters
17. Financial planners
18. Directors of public companies
19. TV reporters
20. Newspaper journalists
21. Business executives
22. Insurance brokers
23. Stock brokers
24. Talk-back radio hosts
25. State MPs
26. Federal MPs
27. Union leaders
28. Real estate agents
29. Advertising people
30. Car salesmen

Source: Roy Morgan annual 'Image of Professions' survey for 2014

Design Thinking makes more money than traditional business management

Since the GFC businesses and investors have struggled to find consistent ways to achieve double digit returns. You can continue to blame the shake out that the credit crunch brought down on our heads, or perhaps the current tough environment is the new normal. The new normal is a world where businesses and governments and media proprietors no longer have control. Everything has been digitised, and thanks to Google and global Internet access from mobile phones at low prices the slevers are now controlled by the public, your customers.

The last decade has seen what Deloitte term the era of Digital Disruption. In a paper last year they identified which Australian industries are facing a short fuse, big bang trashing of their business models. Traditional business models that could control supply and demand and charge a premium have dissappeared or in the case of Delloittes hit list of financial services and are about to.

The businesses that prosper will be those that can embrace the new digital normal. It is the business managers that apply design thinking to their entire way of operating that will survive. The good news for SMEs is they have eless to lose than corporations and also have the management structure to embrace change. The best thing about all this si design thinking makes more money for a business than traditional management approaches. Here are some figures on just how much more profitable design centric businesses have been since the GFC. 

Design Thinking has doubled the returns of companies across a range of industries

The Design Management Institute in the US worked together with Motiv Strategies to create a share market index for tracking the returns of businesses that have Design Thinking at the centre of the organisation. Called the Design Value Index, it shows the 15 rigorously-selected companies that understand the value of design beat the S&P Index by a whopping 228% over the last 10 years.

Who are these profit powerhouse businesses and what do they have in common?

Design is an integrated function across the entire enterprise; they invest in design and it shapes the way employees interact and report, management structure is flat or receptive to ideas; experienced design executives are given power to direct design activities; and there is a senior leadership-level commitment to design. Some of the companies on the list won’t surprise you – Apple, Coca-Cola, Walt Disney and Nike. Others might – Ford, Herman-Miller, IBM, Intuit, Newell-Rubbermaid, Procter & Gamble, Starbucks, Starwood, Steelcase, Target and Whirlpool.

Designers are lateral thinkers, utilise their creative leaps

The way designers think is much more open to ideas, random thoughts from diverse sources and then building on these. By starting with the question what does a customer want and what makes them happy the designer is liberating from current accepted practices within a business. They challenge all aspects, collaborating across all the people in a business from sales to complaints, production to procurement. Compare this to control and command structures, like the public service where you aren’t allowed to ask a superior a question let alone challenge what they believe is the way it’s always been done.

Change, rather than wait to be redundant. As Deloitte warns, redundancy is coming sooner rather than later.

Design Thinking makes more money than traditional business management

Since the GFC businesses and investors have struggled to find consistent ways to achieve double digit returns. You can continue to blame the shakeout that the credit crunch brought down on our heads, or accept that the current tough environment is the new normal. We now have to operate in a world where businesses and governments and media proprietors no longer have control. Everything has been digitised.

Thanks to Google the information levers are now controlled by the public. In other words, your customers now call the shots.

The last decade has seen what Deloitte term the era of Digital Disruption. In a paper last year they identified which Australian industries are facing a short fuse, big bang trashing of business models. Traditional business management techniques that could control supply and demand and charge a premium have disappeared. You can see from Deloitte's hit list, even industries not used to rapid change like financial services and arts and recreation are about to face significant disruption.

Deloitte's Digital Disruption map

The formula for small & medium business survival in this time of disruption

The businesses that prosper next year and beyond will be those that can embrace the new digital normal. It will be the business managers who apply design thinking to their entire way of operating that will survive. The good news for SMEs is they have less to lose than corporations and more flexibility in the management structure to embrace change.

SMEs are perfectly placed to become tomorrow's challenger brands. The best thing about all this is design thinking makes more money for a business than traditional management approaches. Here is a chart that shows just how much more profitable design-centric businesses have been since the GFC. 

Design Thinking has doubled the returns of companies across a range of industries

The Design Management Institute in the US worked together with Motiv Strategies to create a share market index for tracking the returns of businesses that have Design Thinking at the centre of the organisation. Called the Design Value Index, it shows the 15 rigorously-selected companies that understand the value of design beat the S&P Index by a whopping 228% over the last 10 years.

Who are these profit powerhouse businesses and what do they have in common?

Design is an integrated function across the entire enterprise; they invest in design and it shapes the way employees interact and report, management structure is flat or receptive to ideas; experienced design executives are given power to direct design activities; and there is a senior leadership-level commitment to design. Some of the companies on the list won’t surprise you – Apple, Coca-Cola, Walt Disney and Nike. Others might – Ford, Herman-Miller, IBM, Intuit, Newell-Rubbermaid, Procter & Gamble, Starbucks, Starwood, Steelcase, Target and Whirlpool.

Designers are lateral thinkers, utilise their creative leaps

The way designers think is much more open to ideas, random thoughts from diverse sources and then building on these. By starting with the question what does a customer want and what makes them happy the designer is liberating from current accepted practices within a business. They challenge all aspects, collaborating across all the people in a business from sales to complaints, production to procurement. Compare this to control and command structures, like the public service where you aren’t allowed to ask a superior a question let alone challenge what they believe is the way it’s always been done.

Change, rather than wait to be redundant. As Deloitte warns, a big bang of disruption is coming sooner rather than later for most businesses.

How do you lead your business in the Digital Age?

The answer is in the mail. Australia Post is over 204 years old, but that hasn’t stopped it making the most of the digitised world. At a presentation to business leaders at the AGSM Leading The Digital Enterprise event yesterday, I found Tracey Gosling, a director of Australia Post, the biggest surprise. While the usual suspects, like the Head of Policy at Facebook and an author on Innovation helped open the eyes of the bank managers and bureaucrats in the room to the way generation X and Y want to be treated at work, it was the true stories of change at Australia Post I found most useful.

What's the future for AusPost in a digitised world?

Tracey shared real examples of the often simple ways ordinary people in their business have made changes that have worked. They show us what can actually be achieved when the starting point is very grim. Which gives real hope for small and medium sized businesses that aren't as tied down by the inertia of a monopoly like AusPost.

Tracey painted a picture of a vast post office workforce laboring under the emotional burden of the fear of change. Imagine you were a postie, one of my schoolmates from 30 years ago still is. Imagine over the last decade the postie doing the daily rounds would feel the bag of mail on their back was lighter than the week before. And next week it will be lighter still as people stop posting letters. They'd be worrying when will the day come there is no mail to deliver and they're out of a job?

To survive Australia Post has to manage a bigger change to the way customers exchange information than past revolutions like telegraph to telephone, horse borne deliveries to airmail, phone to fax. The Internet has changed everything more significantly than any of those innovations. Manage the change they have.

To quote the Australia Post annual report: “For the 13th consecutive year, we met or exceeded all of the performance standards that relate to our community service obligations. We delivered 95.5 per cent of domestic letters on time or early (against our 94 per cent target) and we increased the number of postal outlets to 4,429 nationwide. Total revenue grew to $5.9 billion and our after-tax profit increased by 10.9 per cent to $311.9 million. This means net profit has grown 21 per cent per annum since we enacted our Future Ready transformation program."

What has AusPost changed to keep up? Nearly everything, they had to. Last year they lost $189 million on mail delivery. AusPost now makes more from servicing e-commerce businesses and other activities that didn’t exist just a decade ago. There are secure 24/7 Parcel Lockers within minutes drive of most homes for out of hours parcel deliveries, digital self serve kiosks in post shops and soon digital I.D. recognition software that will mean documents like banking applications and contracts won’t need signatures by hand.

If a bureaucracy can go digital, so can your business

These changes to a huge and diverse business are making sure it can remain competitive as digitisation changes the world. As with most things in business, change management is being enabled at Auspost from the top. CEO Ahmed Fahour is a case study in the new style of management required for the digital age – leadership by openness, not power. This infographic sums it up nicely.

View this image on Pinterest.

Here are some examples of how Ahmed Fahour has let go of control:

1. Let staff fail

Individuals in offices can change their methods behind the counter to see if it works better than current processes without asking prior permission from senior management. If it doesn’t work, no great loss. If it does make an improvement, it’s shared across the organisation.

2. Social media is for everyone

While most government departments still don’t allow social media or even Google to be used in the office, Fahour has let employees at every level of share an opinion on Facebook. Just a few years before only 2 people were officially given the role to manage social media, yet even then there were 15,000 conversations happening on social media each year amongst staff.

Businesses need to recognise they can’t control what staff want, or constantly roadblock how they want to do it. Indeed today, in the words of former Cisco Senior Director Martin Stewart-Weeks, "a network routes around an obstacle." It's the same with staff, they will go around you, or leave.

3. What does the customer want that they’re not getting?

To improve the way they can fulfill for e-commerce customers, staff who had never shopped online were encouraged to do so in work hours. This led to an understanding at many levels of post  employee of what online businesses do well and not so well, and discover what shoppers want from the whole order to delivery process. One consequent innovation is the 24/7 Parcel Locker, which means you don’t have to be at home to receive a valuable e-purchase.

4. What can you do that’s new?

Things are changing fast, so what you’ve always sold in the past is less likely to be as attractive to new customers tomorrow. Again, take inspiration from the top postie:

“We capitalised on the boom in online shopping with the Parcel & Express Services segment earning profit of $354.8 million, on the back of 9.3 per cent growth in domestic parcel volumes. And, despite difficult retailing conditions, Retail Services profit again grew to $200.6 million, mainly through adding new financial and identity services.”

“Initiatives are all focused on capturing our immediate customer growth opportunities in the digital economy – especially in e-commerce, digital communications and trusted services.”

We are constantly exploring the new possibilities with our clients, it's how we help to keep them growing as successful challenger brands.

What if consumers were as determined as the businesses they dealt with?

Making meaningful comparisons as a consumer is challenging, especially with superannuation. Christopher Zinn says we need to understand how to make informed choices when incumbent businesses operate in a "confuscopoly". 

It is a big ‘what if’ because too many businesses profit from the lack of determination of their customers for better products, services and even prices.The public’s desire for improvement is dulled by a widespread disengagement, resignation and inertia that anything they do may actually be much better for them.

And the consumer malaise seems worse in those markets which really count most because of the sums involved: superannuation, health and other insurances, energy such as electricity and telecommunications.

The symptoms are a lack of switching to better offers, which tends to benefit the incumbent above the challenger brand, and even paying over the odds by sticking with the wrong plan and perhaps the wrong provider.

The figures are sobering. The Australian Communications and Media Authority says poor plan choice around telecoms has cost consumers a probably under-estimated $1.5 billion a year.

Superannuation is confusing for customers

The ATO holds more than $18 billion in lost superannuation accounts. And despite more than 11 million Australians are covered by private health insurance less than 40,000 of them switch each year.

The fault is not solely the consumers. The ‘confusopoly’ of the mobile phone market in particular makes meaningful comparisons more than challenging.

Our cognitive biases, which make us particularly vulnerable to decisions around money and cause us to favour the present as opposed to the future, do not serve us well when it comes to assessing strategies around retirement savings.

And the complex and changing rules around health cover and premium rebates tend to drive policy-holders to sit pretty instead of seeking better value.

Of course some consumers are determined and realise a little time and effort in acquiring knowledge of these markets can save significant pain and expense.

But there’s a limit to even their patience and how much effort is worth it for how little a reward. There’s also the issue of expertise and the imbalance of information: as consumers we are amateurs buying from professionals.

We may only purchase a new car every few years, but the sales staff sell them every day, and however canny you are they will always know more about the vehicle, its true value and how to upsell you on various unnecessary warranties.

One way to correct this asymmetry, as it’s sometimes called, is to gather like-minded consumers together and use their numbers as leverage in negotiating better terms.

It’s already happening in specific markets such as energy and insurance as One Big Switch, with whom I used to be director of campaigns, has demonstrated here and overseas.

Another way is selectively reforming markets by regulation. In Australia conflicts of interest with financial planners led to the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) legislation.

The government is seeking to severely dilute these much needed consumer protections, claiming they are somehow excess ‘red-tape’. In fact they represent a much-needed shark-proof cage for consumers to more safely navigate financial waters.

In the US and UK regulation is helping liberate consumers’ usage data from the back offices of utilities and banks so citizens can employ trusted third parties to crunch the numbers and help them make better decisions.

The determined consumer can take back control

Being determined as a consumer is not just a state of mind, although that helps. In the future it will require the technologies which can bring us together quickly and cheaply to use some people power in markets.

It will also require more consumers to get hold of their own data and then find emerging intermediaries to help them make real sense of the complexity and choice fatigue which bedevils too many markets.

Determined consumers do not need to be told to shop around or read the fine print. They already know that, but they do need help in turning their determination into better decisions.

Christopher Zinn is an independent consumer advocate currently running a campaign to highlight the financial advice protections (www.saveourfofa.com.au). His other initiative is www.determinedconsumer.com.au which is aimed at motivating consumer action. UNO worked with Chris on consumer empowering programmes at CHOICE. He also co-founded One Big Switch as well as being a repoorter/producer at the ABC, Channel Nine and several newspapers.